In this second part of the halftime report for Tax Foundation Forum: Making Sense of Profit Shifting, we discuss the key takeaways from the first half of our series on profit shifting (read part I here). In this post, we...
- The Tax Policy Blog
- New Hampshire, the Super Bowl, and Marijuana Tax Rates ac...
New Hampshire, the Super Bowl, and Marijuana Tax Rates across the States
Washington and Colorado are the first states to legalize the sale and use of marijuana. With the Seahawks and the Broncos in the Super Bowl, all the media chatter around the game has been featuring bad puns about “packing a super ‘bowl’ of marijuana,” or “‘scoring’ before the big game.” But a lot of outlets have missed that the legalization movement is taking shape outside Colorado and Washington as well. The New Hampshire House is likely to pass HB 495, sponsored by Rep. Steve Vaillancourt (R), whereafter the bill will have to pass the Senate and the governor’s desk.
The governor, Maggie Hassan (D) has expressed that she will veto the legalization measure, a peculiarity which prompted noted tax expert David Brunori to quip in Forbes, “Hassan is obviously not as open-minded as the lefty Republicans pushing the legislation.”
But apparently the parties are entirely bucking stereotypes in New Hampshire, because the Republican-backed HB 495 comes with a hefty tax component too: a 15 percent sales tax at the retail level and a $30-per-ounce tax at the wholesale level.
Assuming a retail price of $30 and a wholesale price of $15, the tax on New Hampshire marijuana would be $8.25, or 27.5 percent. Using those same assumptions, a Colorado reporter found that the state and local taxes on marijuana in Denver would be just slightly higher, at $8.59.
In his piece in Forbes, David Brunori makes the case that we shouldn’t subject marijuana to excise taxes at all, because the product doesn’t present a clear negative externality. I’m inclined to agree with that line of thinking, but I think an even more prescient argument to make is that states should be mindful of the blowback from taxing marijuana at such high rates. If operating a business within the parameters of the law is too costly for tax reasons, marijuana will remain an underground industry, which seems to me to entirely defeat the purpose of legalization in the first place.
We already have at least some troubling evidence from Colorado that the rates are too high; this Slate article concludes that it is still more lucrative to be an illegal marijuana dealer.
Follow Scott on Twitter.
Get Email Updates from the Tax Foundation
We will never sell or share your information with third parties.
Join the Tax Foundation's fight for sound tax policy Go
About the Tax Policy Blog
The Tax Policy Blog is the official blog of the Tax Foundation, a non-partisan, non-profit research organization that has monitored tax policy at the federal, state and local levels since 1937. Our economists welcome your feedback. If you would like to send an e-mail to the author of a blog post, please click on that person's name to locate his or her e-mail address or visit our staff page here.