Many people are beginning to wrap their minds around the House Republicans’ proposed destination-based cash-flow tax and what it means for tax reform. Most people are still looking into the tax’s impacts on trade and how...
- The Tax Policy Blog
- Kentucky Considers Tax Rebate for Creationist Theme Park
Kentucky Considers Tax Rebate for Creationist Theme Park
News outlets in my home state of Kentucky report that a Creationist-themed amusement park, “Ark Encounter,” is seeking approval for tax incentives. We wrote on this several years ago when the sponsoring organization, Answers in Genesis (AiG), first applied for tax incentives. Now, AiG is proposing to build the project in smaller stages, instead of all at once, and thus has reduced their incentive request from $43 million to $18.25 million in sales tax rebates.
Kentucky has an extensive set of tax incentives offered to many different industries, with incentives sometimes worth more than 50 percent of a total investment, as I’ve reported previously. The Bluegrass state offers these deals in no small part due to its otherwise high and burdensome state and local taxes, especially income taxes.
Tax incentives create economic distortions, which can lead to inefficient business investments and distortions between sectors based on political preferences. This causes economic losses as state subsidies induce investment and employment decisions based on political concerns rather than profitability.
But the Ark Encounter tax incentives reveal another fundamental concern with tax incentives: they put the government in the awkward position of financing speech that many voters may not support. Whether it’s film tax incentives to movies and political TV shows or sales tax rebates for religious businesses, tax incentives interject public resources into private concerns. No matter a person’s religious beliefs, Answers in Genesis presumably has a right to use its own money to build a theme park, and enjoy equal treatment under the law. But when equal treatment means access to special incentives, tax incentives can have unintended effects.
The solution to this problem isn’t simply to selectively deny tax breaks to some firms based on political or religious preferences, creating a problem of even more explicit political favoritism. Rather, the demand for generous tax incentives reveals problematic elements of state taxes. If policymakers in Kentucky want to promote economic growth, broad-based tax reform is more effective than narrow handouts, and helps reduce thorny political questions like those surrounding Ark Encounter.
Read more on Kentucky here.
Read more on tax incentives here.
Follow Lyman on Twitter.
Get Email Updates from the Tax Foundation
Join the Tax Foundation's fight for sound tax policy Go
About the Tax Policy Blog
The Tax Policy Blog is the official blog of the Tax Foundation, a non-partisan, non-profit research organization that has monitored tax policy at the federal, state and local levels since 1937. Our economists welcome your feedback. If you would like to send an e-mail to the author of a blog post, please click on that person's name to locate his or her e-mail address or visit our staff page here.
Recent Blog Posts
Related State Articles
- Lunch Links: Republican Plan Upcoming for Sales Tax on Internet Buys; Walmart Avoids Excessive Tax Proposed by Puerto Rico; Explaining Why States Should Index Tax Brackets for Inflation
- Lunch Links: Trump Takes Hits from Clinton (Release Tax Returns) and Forbes (Troublesome Pass-Through Rate Reduction); NCSL Calls on Congress for Marijuana Reforms
- Lunch Links: Puerto Rico Bill This Week; David Allen Coe Sentenced; Noah's Ark Tax Credits
- 1 of 14
- next ›