Tax systems initially built to protect women and low-income spouses can actually incentivize women to exit the workforce, or devalue their labor. This can be seen in Japan, where a spousal deduction leads to a phenomenon...
- The Tax Policy Blog
- Response to Politico: Taxes and the Texas Miracle
Response to Politico: Taxes and the Texas Miracle
Caleb Hannan at Politico has a story today on Governor Rick Perry’s (R) tour promoting Texas’ business climate in other states. We’ve written about Governor Perry’s campaign several times before, noting that while Texas’ business tax climate is generally good, it does have some problems, such as its margin tax. Over the course of Governor Perry’s campaign, several firms have announced intentions to relocate into Texas, most prominently Raytheon and Toyota. Meanwhile, Texas’ economic performance during the recession has remained robust, creating close to 2 million net new jobs. As Politico reports, this has led to some talk about a “Texas miracle.” Additionally, state tax competition often includes distortionary tax incentives that lead to lose-lose economic policies among the states.
Exactly what makes Texas’ economy so strong is a matter of much debate. Politico suggests that most of Texas’ job growth is due to oil and gas extraction, and says that “a century’s worth of data suggest” that Texas’ experience isn’t something that can be engineered by policy changes. The article also quotes a variety of sources suggesting that taxes don’t matter much for site selection, and state and local taxes are quite small. Overall, it gives the impression that states can’t effectively use policy (or at least tax policy) to shape their own economic fortunes.
However, attributing Texas’ whole experience to fossil fuel industries is inappropriate. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, since 2007, Texas has added about 82,000 mining and logging industry workers, which constitutes major job growth by any measure. But meanwhile, the Lone Star State also added 228,000 workers in education and health, 156,000 in professional services, 162,000 in hospitality services, 130,000 in trade and transportation, even 80,000 in government.
So while fossil fuel extraction certainly matters, it’s hard to say that’s the whole story. Government employment (not something Texas is known for) grew by almost the same amount, and many other sectors added even more employees. Have fossil fuels helped Texas’ economic growth? Absolutely. Can Texas’ success be written down entirely to natural resources? Absolutely not.
In fact, the academic evidence that taxes affect economic growth is strong. High, progressive taxes on mobile factors of production do harm economic growth. States lacking Texas’ natural resource bounty, such as Indiana, have also seen strong economic results from adopting sound tax and other economic policies. And, as I’ve written at some length in response to criticisms of our State Business Tax Climate Index, there is enormous evidence to support the idea that sound tax policies support economic growth, ranging from academic studies to surveys of businesses. Beyond that, there is strong recent evidence that international investment choices (such as those that Toyota faces) are indeed influenced by state policy choices like taxes (as well as education expenditure, labor policy, etc).
There’s a fair point to be made that, insofar as states compete by offering narrow tax incentives, their policies are counter-productive. Narrow tax incentives favor some businesses over others, leaving mature firms in a state to foot the full freight of the tax bill while incentivized firms benefit. Furthermore, time-limited incentive plans probably don’t have a large impact on long-term investment decisions.
But long-term tax policies do matter. Stable, neutral, non-distortionary tax policies, offering low tax rates on broad tax bases, can support economic growth. Firm site selection is one channel, through which taxes affect economic decisions on the margin. There is robust evidence that taxes (while certainly not the only or even the largest factor) do matter for site selection. And, as one of the few site selection variables policymakers can directly control, it makes sense for them to be concerned about the role of taxes.
Read more on Texas here.
Read more on tax incentives and credits here.
Follow Lyman on Twitter.
Get Email Updates from the Tax Foundation
Join the Tax Foundation's fight for sound tax policy Go
About the Tax Policy Blog
The Tax Policy Blog is the official blog of the Tax Foundation, a non-partisan, non-profit research organization that has monitored tax policy at the federal, state and local levels since 1937. Our economists welcome your feedback. If you would like to send an e-mail to the author of a blog post, please click on that person's name to locate his or her e-mail address or visit our staff page here.
Recent Blog Posts
Related State Articles
- Lunch Links: Toll Roads Reduce Non-Tolled Traffic, KU Coach Uses Kansas Tax Break, Labor Department Overtime Rule
- Lunch Links: IRS Auditing by Telephone, President Obama vs. Senator Paul on Tax Treaties, Jamba Juice Flees California
- Businesses Love Texas, Except this One Tax that Holds the State Back
- 1 of 25
- next ›