NY Times Message To Investors Contradicts Editorial Stand On Minimum Wage Hike

 
 
February 20, 2014

Today we will add the New York Times to the list of parties that understand how labor costs impact their own bottom line, but deny the broader economic effects of a mandated increase in the federal minimum wage.

In this morning’s lead editorial,“The Clear Benefits of a Higher Wage,” the editorial board of the New York Times criticized Republicans for exaggerating the estimated job losses stemming from an increase in the minimum wage made by the Congressional Budget Office. Yet, it the 2013 10K financial report the company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the company warned investors that high labor costs could impact its own profitability and efficiency:

A significant number of our employees are unionized, and our business and results of operations could be adversely affected if labor negotiations or contracts were to further restrict our ability to maximize the efficiency of our operations.

Approximately half of our full-time equivalent work force is unionized. As a result, we are required to negotiate the wages, salaries, benefits, staffing levels and other terms with many of our employees collectively. Our results could be adversely affected if future labor negotiations or contracts were to further restrict our ability to maximize the efficiency of our operations. If we were to experience labor unrest, strikes or other business interruptions in connection with labor negotiations or otherwise, or if we are unable to negotiate labor contracts on reasonable terms, our ability to produce and deliver our most significant products could be impaired. In addition, our ability to make short-term adjustments to control compensation and benefits costs, rebalance our portfolio of businesses or otherwise adapt to changing business needs may be limited by the terms and duration of our collective bargaining agreements. (NYTimes, 2013 10K, page 10).

The Times says that CBO’s widely cited potential loss figure of 500,000 jobs “bears further scrutiny, because, unlike the benefits, the employment estimates have been disputed by a wide variety of nonpartisan economic studies.”

To be sure, there are many conflicting academic studies on the effects of a mandated minimum wage increase. However, Times management could perform its own experiment by meeting the demands of its labor unions and see how that would impact the company’s ability to deliver it “most significant products.” It would then understand how a minimum wage hike would affect millions of small businesses.

 

Buy this blogger a cup of coffee!

Sizes

Follow Us

About the Tax Policy Blog

Subscribe to Tax Foundation - Tax Foundation's Tax Policy Blog The Tax Policy Blog is the official weblog of the Tax Foundation, a non-partisan, non-profit research organization that has monitored tax policy at the federal, state and local levels since 1937. Our economists welcome your feedback. If you would like to send an e-mail to the author of a blog post, please click on that person's name to locate his or her e-mail address or visit our staff page here.

Monthly Archive

Privacy Policy