Many people are beginning to wrap their minds around the House Republicans’ proposed destination-based cash-flow tax and what it means for tax reform. Most people are still looking into the tax’s impacts on trade and how...
- The Tax Policy Blog
- New York City Enacts Corporate Income Tax Conformity Pack...
New York City Enacts Corporate Income Tax Conformity Package
Earlier this month, New York City enacted legislation that conforms many of the state-level corporate tax reforms signed into law by New York Governor Andrew Cuomo last year. While the City’s tax package doesn't adopt all of the state changes, it still makes significant progress in making New York City a better place to do business by reducing compliance costs.
According to Tax Analysts [subscription required],
S 4610, like the state's new regime, merges the bank tax with the corporate franchise tax, phases in single-sales- factor apportionment, adopts market-based sourcing, and institutes unitary combined reporting. However, S 4610 doesn't apply to S corporations, which remain taxable under the city's previous corporate tax structure. The legislation also doesn't change the unincorporated business tax for the city, nor does it restore a city tax on the earnings of nonresidents.
Further, the new legislation doesn't conform the city's economic nexus threshold to new standards for the rest of the state. In the state, there is a threshold of $1 million in receipts for economic nexus…
One additional non-conforming provision is worth mentioning. The City tax package reduces the number of corporate income tax bases from four to three (definitely a move in the right direction), while the state is further reduces the number of bases to just two. As I pointed out in January:
Unfortunately, the City will not phase out one of the corporate tax bases that is being phased out by the state—the capital base. Prior the 2013 state reforms, four tax bases existed in New York State, and a business would pay the highest of them. These were (1) 7.1 percent of net income; (2) 0.15 percent on "business and investment capital base" (more info on this here); (3) an alternative minimum tax of 1.5 percent; or (4) a fixed dollar amount tax.
The 2013 state reforms eliminated the capital base (2) and the alternative minimum tax (3). The city will retain the capital base, however.
This capital tax will have a higher maximum payment level of $10 million, increased from its current level of $1 million. The general 0.15 percent rate is reduced to 0.04 percent for cooperative housing corporations.
State legislation from last year created a preferential tax rate for certain manufactures by reducing their net income tax rate to zero. These types of carve-outs aren't good policy because they don’t treat businesses similarly and they shrink the size of the tax base (forcing the rate to be higher on other types of firms to bring in the same amount of revenue). The best structured taxes are those that have broad bases and a single rate on all firms, regardless of size or industry.
The City tax package doesn't go so far as to reduce the manufacturer rate to zero, but it does create several special rates for certain types of businesses. These include:
- Special net income rates for certain small businesses and manufacturers. These include a tax rate reduction from 8.85 percent to 6.5 percent for qualified small non-manufacturers and rate reduction from 8.85 percent to 4.425 percent for qualified small manufacturers. To obtain these preferential rates, businesses must meet certain business income requirements, with smaller income businesses getting a lower rate. Preferential rates are phased out as business income increases.
- A new income tax rate of 9 percent is created for financial corporations with more than $100 billion in assets.
More on New York here.
Get Email Updates from the Tax Foundation
Join the Tax Foundation's fight for sound tax policy Go
About the Tax Policy Blog
The Tax Policy Blog is the official blog of the Tax Foundation, a non-partisan, non-profit research organization that has monitored tax policy at the federal, state and local levels since 1937. Our economists welcome your feedback. If you would like to send an e-mail to the author of a blog post, please click on that person's name to locate his or her e-mail address or visit our staff page here.
Recent Blog Posts
Related State Articles
- Lunch Links: Growing Nature of Marijuana Taxes; Meeting of the Minds between EU and Ireland; Out of His Role as Trump, Alec Baldwin in Some Tax Trouble
- Lunch Links: Handy Tax Calculator Before Casting Your Presidential Ballot; New York, not Nevada, Could Haul in Biggest Casino Taxes; EU Nations Debate Tax Haven Definition
- Lunch Links: Raising Gas Taxes A 'Non-Issue' for Incumbents in Iowa Legislative Races; High-Income Earner Taxes on Ballot in California and Maine; Corporate Tax Breaks for Housing, Development Projects Cost NYC $3 Billion
- 1 of 74
- next ›