Illinois continues to struggle with its budget. The state’s most recent stopgap budget expired on December 31, 2016. To perhaps break up the political logjam, Illinois senators of both political parties have begun...
- The Tax Policy Blog
- Massachusetts Implements Reduction in Personal Income Tax...
Massachusetts Implements Reduction in Personal Income Tax Rates
Massachusetts taxpayers will face a slightly smaller tax bill in 2012, thanks to a reduction of their flat income tax rate from 5.3 percent to 5.25 percent, as special conditions were met for an automatic adjustment in tax rates. A referendum in 2000 mandated a gradual reduction from 5.95 percent to 5 percent by fiscal year 2003, but lawmakers revised the mandate in a statute in 2002, freezing the rate at 5.3 percent until the state's tax revenues (adjusted for inflation) grew for four quarters in a row.
Massachusetts taxpayers have the nation's 11th highest tax burden and score 15th highest in our individual income tax index. Massachusetts taxpayers worked until April 14 this year to pay their total tax bill, ranking the state tenth nationally. While the rate reduction may seem paltry, it is a step in the right direction toward giving Massachusetts a more competitive tax code.
Massachusetts has experienced numerous changes to its income tax rate in the last two decades, forcing taxpayers to plan under a cloud of uncertainty. From TaxAnalysts (subscription required):
- "in 1989 the legislature increased the 5 percent rate to 5.75 percent in what was described at the time as a temporary increase;
- in 1990 the rate was raised to 6.25 percent;
- in 1992 the rate dropped to 5.95 percent;
- in January 2000 the rate was cut again, to 5.85 percent; and
- in November 2000, voters approved a ballot measure to cut the rate to 5.6 percent for tax year 2001, 5.3 percent for tax year 2002, and 5 percent for tax year 2003 and after."
But, to give credit where it is due, Massachusetts tax policy has the merit of taxing income at a flat rate, rather than at progressive rates. This fact may go some way toward explaining why tax revenues have grown lately, despite troubling situations in other states. Many studies find that a state's budget gap is likely to be smaller under a less progressive rate schedule, because a progressive rate schedule tends to make the tax revenue stream more volatile.
More on Massachusetts here.
Get Email Updates from the Tax Foundation
Join the Tax Foundation's fight for sound tax policy Go
About the Tax Policy Blog
The Tax Policy Blog is the official blog of the Tax Foundation, a non-partisan, non-profit research organization that has monitored tax policy at the federal, state and local levels since 1937. Our economists welcome your feedback. If you would like to send an e-mail to the author of a blog post, please click on that person's name to locate his or her e-mail address or visit our staff page here.
Recent Blog Posts
Related State Articles
- Lunch Links: Mnuchin Promises Tax Reform within First 90 Days of Trump Administration; Chopping Itemized Deductions Not Panacea in Trump Tax Plan; Massachusetts Latest State to Consider Soda Tax
- Lunch Links: Sen. Blumenthal Calls for Simplifying Tax on Business Travelers; Massachusetts Girding for 2018 Income Tax Boost; Maryland Legislators Warned about Revenue Gap
- Lunch Links: Britain Hints at Cutting Corporate Tax Rate Over EU Trade Impasse; Former Oregon Governor Against Gross Receipts Tax Measure; Voting to Legalize Marijuana in Massachusetts Could Lead to Higher Tax
- 1 of 35
- next ›