President Obama just announced at a press conference that he has directed Treasury Secretary Jack Lew to demand the resignation of the Acting IRS Commissioner, Steven Miller. CNN then obtained Miller's resignation letter...
- The Tax Policy Blog
- How Much Implicit Tax Revenue Did Lotteries Raise in FY2010?
How Much Implicit Tax Revenue Did Lotteries Raise in FY2010?
Christmas may have passed, but today many lottery players were still hoping for Santa to bring them one last gift: the $200 million Mega Millions lottery jackpot.
The lucky winner(s) will have to pay tax on the winnings, but probably won't give any thought to the other type of lottery tax: The lottery revenue kept by state governments and used for services like public education or parks is actually implicit tax revenue.
In FY 2010 lotteries generated over $58 billion in consumer spending. This translated to a profit for state coffers of over $17 billion. (Lottery sales had dropped slightly in FY2009, probably due to the recession, but they're on the way back up in 2010.) Slightly over half the money spent is returned to players as prizes. Part of the remainder covers operating costs-including vendor commissions, equipment, administration and advertising-and the rest is transferred to state coffers. States call their portion "profit" but it is actually implicit tax revenue.
Lottery proponents argue that a tax is a mandatory payment, and playing the lottery is voluntary, so lottery revenue cannot be tax revenue. But they're confusing the purchase of a product with the payment of the tax on the product. Purchasing a lottery ticket is voluntary, but the tax portion of the ticket price is not, just as a sales or excise tax is compulsory on a voluntary purchase of alcohol, clothing or books. Lottery revenue is a poorly designed tax, failing the tests of sound tax policy. Policymakers, however, often fail to recognize or acknowledge that the revenue is a tax, preferring to label it "miscellaneous revenue."
We can calculate a particular state's implicit lottery tax rate the same way an excise tax rate is calculated. The chart below presents total sales figures and implicit tax rates for most states' lotteries (states with video lottery terminals are omitted) in FY 2010.
Lottery Finances, FY 2010
|Lottery Jurisdiction|| Sales |
| Profit (Implicit Tax Revenue) |
| Implicit |
|Delaware (a) (c)||$684.50||$275.50||(c)|
|New York (a) (c)||$7,818.32||$2,666.38||(c)|
|North Dakota (d)||$24.42||$6.33||35.00%|
|Oregon (a) (c)||$1,027.68||$516.70||(c)|
|Rhode Island (b) (c)||$702.40||$344.65||(c)|
|South Dakota (b) (c)||$260.99||$116.91||(c)|
|West Virginia (a) (c)||$1,358.00||$568.90||(c)|
* The implicit tax rate measures the tax revenue (profits) as a percentage of the value of the lottery ticket (prize money plus administrative costs). The implicit tax rate does not take into account federal or state income tax on winnings.
(a) Includes net VLT sales (cash in less cash out).
(b) Include gross VLT sales (cash in).
(c) States with video lottery terminals (VLT) do not all report video lottery sales the same way; therefore, the figures for these states are not strictly comparable to other states with or without video lottery terminals (see notes (a) and (b)).
(d) Estimated FY 2010 sales and profits
Source: North American Association of State and Provincial Lotteries; Tax Foundation calculations.
Buy this blogger a cup of coffee!
Join the Tax Foundation's fight for sound tax policy Go
About the Tax Policy Blog
The Tax Policy Blog is the official weblog of the Tax Foundation, a non-partisan, non-profit research organization that has monitored tax policy at the federal, state and local levels since 1937. Our economists welcome your feedback. If you would like to send an e-mail to the author of a blog post, please click on that person's name to locate his or her e-mail address or visit our staff page here.