The U.S. Has the Third Worst Tax Code in the Developed World
September 18, 2014
In our new International Tax Competitiveness Index, the United States ranks 32nd out of the 34 countries in the OECD. This puts the United States behind countries such as Spain and Italy and just in front of Portugal and France.
There are a few main drivers behind the U.S.’s low score in the ITCI. There are the obvious ones: the U.S. has the developed world’s highest corporate tax rate at 39.1 percent and it is one of six remaining OECD countries that taxes corporate income no matter where in the world it’s earned.
But there are also some less obvious factors for the U.S.’s poor ranking.
The United States has higher than average, progressive, top marginal income tax rate at 46.3 percent (federal and state average). This is higher than income tax rates in countries like Belgium, the United Kingdom, and Norway. It is also more progressive than income taxes in Germany, Finland, and Sweden. (In Sweden, the top tax rate applies to income above $88,180 whereas, in the U.S., the top rate applies to income above about $400,000.)
The U.S. also has above average taxes on capital gains and dividends. When looking at both federal and average state taxes, the United States taxes capital gains at a top marginal rate of 28.7 percent, which is sixth highest in the OECD. The story is much the same for dividends. The U.S. has the 9th highest top marginal dividend tax rate in the OECD at 28.6 percent.
Finally, the U.S. ranks poorly on property taxes. This is due to the U.S. estate and gift tax, and the poor structure of state and local property taxes.
The largest issues with the U.S. tax code are due to the federal tax system. States are constantly searching for ways to improve their tax codes, with governors from both parties enacting meaningful reform in the last year. But there is only so much states can do. If the U.S. wants to compete on a global stage, the federal tax code will need to change. A lower corporate tax rate, lower tax rates on investment, and a shift to a territorial tax system would be a good start.
Was this page helpful to you?
The Tax Foundation works hard to provide insightful tax policy analysis. Our work depends on support from members of the public like you. Would you consider contributing to our work?Contribute to the Tax Foundation
Let us know how we can better serve you!
We work hard to make our analysis as useful as possible. Would you consider telling us more about how we can do better?Give Us Feedback