Three Tax Initiatives Removed from Nevada Ballot
July 7, 2008
According to the Las Vegas Review-Journal, three tax-related initiatives were removed from Nevada’s November ballot by a judge despite having 100,000 signatures each (58,628 signatures, distributed from each county, is needed). The judge ordered the removal because the petitions failed to comply with new rules requiring signature gatherers to count the signatures and attest that all signatures were made in his or her presence. The requirements were adopted in July 2007 to combat fraud but have yet to be posted to the Secretary of State’s website.
Two of the petitions sought to raise the room tax collected by the Las Vegas Convention and Visitor’s Authority from 3 percent to 13 percent. One would give the money specifically to public education. The other would include public safety and other purposes as well as public schools.
The third petition would have changed Nevada’s initiative petition process to require a two-thirds vote of the people to raise any taxes or fees — the same super-majority the Legislature must get to do so. At present, a simple majority is all a petition needs to raise taxes.
The petitions for the first two proposals were successfully challenged by a member of the Las Vegas Convention and Visitor’s Authority. The third petition was successfully challenged by a member of the Nevada State Education Association.
Proponents are mulling their next move:
Former State Controller Steve Martin, a backer of the three initiatives, refused to say whether the ruling by Russell would be appealed to the Supreme Court.[…]
Scott Scherer, attorney for Nevadans for Fair Taxes that supported the petitions, said there was “substantial compliance” in gathering the signatures for the petition. He said there was no evidence of fraud involved in the gathering of the signatures.
Judge Russell asked Scherer how long it would take to correct the defective affidavits. Scherer said that could be accomplished in one or two weeks.
But in his ruling, the judge said, “We can’t go back and un-ring the bell.” He said the signatures of voters were collected under different standards and the backers should not be given a second chance to correct their mistakes.
More on Nevada here.
Was this page helpful to you?
The Tax Foundation works hard to provide insightful tax policy analysis. Our work depends on support from members of the public like you. Would you consider contributing to our work?Contribute to the Tax Foundation
Let us know how we can better serve you!
We work hard to make our analysis as useful as possible. Would you consider telling us more about how we can do better?Give Us Feedback