Is There a 10 Percent Cosmetic Surgery Tax Coming?
Drudge is quoting a CONGRESS DAILY report, which says that lawmakers are interested in raising revenue for health care reform via a “10% excise tax on cosmetic surgery deemed unnecessary for medical purposes.”
Good tax policy would argue that such an excise tax would only be imposed if there was truly a negative harm that cosmetic surgery imposes on others in society (i.e. negative externality), not merely a way to raise revenue.
Which begs the question…is there a negative externality from cosmetic surgeries?
Actually, at first thought, if an attractive appearance provides benefits to others in society that cannot be excluded (i.e. a public good), then maybe there should be a subsidy for cosmetic surgery as opposed to a tax. On the other wrinkle-free hand, if cosmetic surgery is buying a signal that too many people end up buying from social welfare perspective (e.g. like Spence argues with higher education), then maybe a tax would be justified.
Was this page helpful to you?
Thank you!
The Tax Foundation works hard to provide insightful tax policy analysis. Our work depends on support from members of the public like you. Would you consider contributing to our work?
Contribute to the Tax FoundationLet us know how we can better serve you!
We work hard to make our analysis as useful as possible. Would you consider telling us more about how we can do better?
Give Us Feedback