cost recovery


Featured Research

Prospects for Federal Tax Policy After the 2020 Election

November 10, 2020

Designing a Global Minimum Tax with Full Expensing

September 23, 2020

FAQ on Neutral Cost Recovery and Expensing

July 10, 2020

Empirical Evidence Shows Expensing Leads to More Investment and Higher Employment

May 19, 2020

White House Considers Neutral Cost Recovery for Structures

May 6, 2020

Reviewing the Benefits of Full Expensing for the Post-Pandemic Economic Recovery

April 27, 2020


Related Articles

How Expensing for Capital Investment Can Accelerate the Transition to a Cleaner Economy

Tax Extenders Hitch a Ride on Omnibus and COVID-19 Relief Deal

Outlining a Path for Tax Policy Compromises

Navigating the 2020 Tax Extenders in the Pandemic Economy

Increasing the Tax Burden on Capital Investment and Automation Hurts Workers

Prospects for Federal Tax Policy After the 2020 Election

Reviewing the Commitment to American GROWTH Act

Designing a Global Minimum Tax with Full Expensing

How the CARES Act Fixed a Tax Bias Against Green Investment

New Accelerated Depreciation Policies to Spur Investment in Australia, Austria, Germany, and New Zealand

Economic Recovery and Deductions for Worker Training

Inventory Valuation in Europe

Estimating Neutral Cost Recovery’s Impact on Affordable Housing

Details and Analysis of The CREATE JOBS Act

Three-Fourths of New 2016 Investment Was Excluded from Improved Cost Recovery

1980s Tax Reform, Cost Recovery, and the Real Estate Industry: Lessons for Today

Attracting Manufacturing to the U.S. Should Start with Neutral Tax Treatment, Not Subsidies

Biden’s Plan to Boost Research and Development Should Include Cancellation of Upcoming R&D Amortization

FAQ on Neutral Cost Recovery and Expensing

Did 1986 Tax Reform Hurt Affordable Housing?