Supreme Court Protects Taxpayer From Discriminatory Property Taxation
December 4, 2007
This morning, the Supreme Court announced a unanimous 9-0 decision in CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Georgia State Board of Equalization, ruling in favor of a railroad seeking to challenge Georgia’s property tax assessment methods, a change which resulted in a 47 percent increase in its property tax bill over the previous year. The Tax Foundation filed a brief with the Supreme Court in support of CSX’s challenge.
The Tax Foundation’s brief argued that the federal 4-R Act allows railroads to challenge assessment methods as a way to prevent discriminatory taxation. “Discriminatory assessment methods cannot be shielded from legal challenge because Congress has exercised its power to limit states’ ability to use any conceivable method of assessing and taxing railroad transportation property.” We argued that the ability of taxpayers to challenge flawed property tax assessment methods is important for ensuring transparency and stability in the tax system.
Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the Court’s opinion, which echoed many of our arguments. “The total lack of textual support for Georgia’s position is not surprising,” the opinion states. “The dichotomy the State presses would eviscerate the statute by forcing courts to defer to the valuation estimate of the State, when discriminatory taxation by States was the very evil the Act aimed to ban.” The opinion also notes that “preventing courts from scrutinizing valuation methodologies would render [the 4-R Act] a largely empty command.”
The Supreme Court opinion in CSX can be read here.
The Tax Foundation’s brief in CSX and previous blog coverage can be read here.
Was this page helpful to you?
The Tax Foundation works hard to provide insightful tax policy analysis. Our work depends on support from members of the public like you. Would you consider contributing to our work?Contribute to the Tax Foundation
Let us know how we can better serve you!
We work hard to make our analysis as useful as possible. Would you consider telling us more about how we can do better?Give Us Feedback