Ranking Unemployment Insurance Taxes on the 2021 State Business Tax Climate Index

December 16, 2020

Today’s map is the final in our series examining each of the five major components of the 2021 State Business Tax Climate Index. Compared to individual, corporate, sales, and property taxes, unemployment insurance (UI) taxes are less widely understood, but they have important implications for a state’s business climate. A state’s performance on the UI tax component accounts for 9.4 percent of that state’s overall Index score.

Unemployment insurance is a joint federal-state social insurance program that finances benefits for recently unemployed workers through taxes on employers. State UI tax systems are often quite complex, using variable-rate structures that impose different rates depending on the age of a business, its layoff history, and the health of the state’s UI trust fund, among other factors. All 50 states and the District of Columbia levy UI taxes, but some states structure their systems better than others.

The least-damaging UI tax systems are those that adhere closely to the federal taxable wage base, have low minimum and maximum tax rates on each rate schedule, avoid levying surtaxes or creating benefit add-ons, and have straightforward experience formulas and charging methods. More harmful UI tax systems are those that have high minimum and maximum rates, wage bases that far exceed the federal level, complicated experience formulas and charging methods, and surtaxes or benefit add-ons that go beyond the core functions of the UI program.

On this year’s Index, the states with the best-scoring UI tax systems are Oklahoma, Florida, Delaware, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Ohio. The worst-structured UI tax systems are found in Massachusetts, Kentucky, Idaho, Nevada, Virginia, and Alaska.

Ranking Unemployment Insurance Taxes on the 2021 State Business Tax Climate Index, Best and worst state unemployment insurance tax codes

The climates created by UI policies can differ greatly. Some states have high statutory minimum and maximum tax rates that apply to large taxable wage bases, while others have low minimum and maximum rates and low taxable wage bases. For example, Arizona, California, Florida, and Tennessee align their taxable wage base with the federal base of $7,000 per employee, while other states extend the taxable wage base far beyond the federal minimum, so that the tax is applied on tens of thousands of dollars of each employee’s wages. (Currently, Washington is the state with the highest taxable wage base, at $52,700.) Rates can only be understood in tandem with wage bases. A 10 percent tax on a $7,000 wage base raises $700, while the same rate on a $49,800 wage base generates $4,980.

Another important consideration is a state’s experience rating formula, which varies from state to state. The concept behind experience ratings is that each employer’s UI tax liability should be adjusted by their own past experience with layoffs. Companies with frequent layoffs face greater liability than companies with steadier track records. But there are different ways that these ratings can be calculated, and different approaches for handling new businesses which have yet to develop a meaningful track record. Some states lean more heavily on aggregate state “experience,” while others focus more specifically on individual businesses. Some use what is called a benefit ratio formula, based on the ratio of unemployment benefits to payroll. Others use a benefit wage ratio formula, or a reserve ratio formula, defined as the balance in the employer’s state unemployment insurance account divided by payroll.

One of the most harmful aspects of UI taxes is that financially troubled businesses, for which layoffs may be a matter of survival, are shifted into higher tax rate schedules when they can least afford to pay a higher tax bill. Failing businesses face ever-higher UI taxes, sending them into further decline. Similarly, surtaxes imposed when UI fund reserves are low mean higher tax liability right when businesses are struggling most. Well-designed UI tax systems emphasize greater stability and predictability.

This issue is particularly important during the ongoing coronavirus crisis. Unemployment compensation funds are inadequately funded in many states, with many states already turning to federal loans (Title XII Advances) to cover shortfalls. The short-term priority should be ensuring that businesses remain viable and able to rehire laid off workers when the health crisis abates, not raising UI taxes immediately to replenish the depleted funds. Many states have already moved to delay automatic rate increases or freeze experience ratings temporarily.

To read more about how UI tax systems are evaluated in the Indexclick here.

To determine whether your state’s unemployment insurance tax has risen or fallen in the ranks in recent years, see the following table.

Unemployment Insurance Tax Component of the State Business Tax Climate Index (2018–2021)
State 2021 Rank Change from 2020 to 2021 2020 Rank 2019 Rank 2018 Rank
Alabama 14 4 18 12 11
Alaska 45 1 46 35 25
Arizona 8 -2 6 13 15
Arkansas 23 0 23 34 32
California 21 1 22 17 13
Colorado 41 2 43 40 35
Connecticut 22 -1 21 23 19
Delaware 3 0 3 3 3
Florida 2 0 2 2 2
Georgia 39 0 39 38 38
Hawaii 25 3 28 26 27
Idaho 48 0 48 48 46
Illinois 43 -3 40 42 42
Indiana 27 -2 25 11 10
Iowa 37 -2 35 33 34
Kansas 13 1 14 15 12
Kentucky 49 0 49 47 47
Louisiana 4 0 4 4 4
Maine 33 -1 32 24 44
Maryland 34 -1 33 28 24
Massachusetts 50 0 50 50 49
Michigan 18 -1 17 49 48
Minnesota 32 2 34 25 37
Mississippi 5 0 5 5 5
Missouri 7 2 9 8 7
Montana 20 0 20 21 20
Nebraska 11 0 11 9 9
Nevada 47 0 47 45 45
New Hampshire 44 1 45 44 43
New Jersey 31 -1 30 32 36
New Mexico 9 -1 8 10 16
New York 38 0 38 31 30
North Carolina 10 0 10 7 6
North Dakota 12 1 13 14 14
Ohio 6 1 7 6 8
Oklahoma 1 0 1 1 1
Oregon 36 0 36 37 31
Pennsylvania 40 2 42 46 50
Rhode Island 30 1 31 29 23
South Carolina 24 2 26 27 29
South Dakota 42 2 44 39 39
Tennessee 26 -2 24 22 22
Texas 16 -4 12 18 26
Utah 17 -2 15 16 21
Vermont 15 1 16 20 18
Virginia 46 -5 41 43 41
Washington 19 0 19 19 17
West Virginia 28 1 29 30 28
Wisconsin 35 2 37 41 40
Wyoming 29 -2 27 36 33
District of Columbia 37 -2 35 33 30

Note: A rank of 1 is best, 50 is worst. All scores are for fiscal years. DC’s score and rank do not affect other states.

Source: Tax Foundation.

To learn more about how we determined these rankings, read our full methodology here.

Was this page helpful to you?

No

Thank You!

The Tax Foundation works hard to provide insightful tax policy analysis. Our work depends on support from members of the public like you. Would you consider contributing to our work?

Contribute to the Tax Foundation

Related Articles

A property tax is primarily levied on immovable property like land and buildings, as well as on tangible personal property that is movable, like vehicles and equipment. Property taxes are the single largest source of state and local revenue in the U.S. and help fund schools, roads, police, and other services.