South Carolina Governor Vetoes Cigarette Tax Increase
June 3, 2008
South Carolina will continue to have the lowest state cigarette tax in the U.S. (7 cents per pack) following Governor Mark Sanford’s veto of a bill (H. 3567) that would raise it by 50 cents per pack. The House sustained the veto on May 27. The tax increase would have made South Carolina’s cigarette tax higher than neighbors Georgia and North Carolina. We’ve written extensively on how the wide variety of state cigarette excise taxes provides opportunities for consumers to shop for bargains across borders—and for smugglers to make substantial profits.
Sanford had been willing to sign a cigarette tax increase, but only as part of a fundamental tax reform that would create an optional flat income tax of 3.4 percent with no deductions, along with the existing 7 percent rate with deductions (one of the highest in the region). Because the legislature did not include the reform with the cigarette tax increase, Sanford refused to support it.
The tax increase had been expected to cost taxpayers $158 million, with the funds used to expand the state’s Medicaid program.
Audrey Silk, who heads NYC Citizens Lobbying Against Smoker Harassment, said it’s ridiculous to expect smokers to quit just because the price is climbing. She switched to rolling her own cigarettes since the last New York City tax increase and suggests other smokers will find similar ways to satisfy nicotine cravings.
“No product has a tax at this rate on it,” Silk said. “If there was, there would be screaming, but since we’ve been beaten into submission and nobody listens to us, what else is there to do? It’s unjustifiable and you turn to alternatives, and any consumer group would do the same.”
Was this page helpful to you?
The Tax Foundation works hard to provide insightful tax policy analysis. Our work depends on support from members of the public like you. Would you consider contributing to our work?Contribute to the Tax Foundation
Let us know how we can better serve you!
We work hard to make our analysis as useful as possible. Would you consider telling us more about how we can do better?Give Us Feedback