Quiz on the Consumption Tax
August 25, 2005
True or false: Shifting to a consumption-based tax system could boost U.S. GDP by some 9 percent in the long run?
True, according to UC Berkeley’s Prof. Alan Auerbach. That’s just one of several consumption tax lessons in Auerbach’s excellent piece in this morning’s Wall Street Journal (subscription req.):
Q.1: A shift to a consumption tax could increase GDP in the long run by as much as 9%.
A: True. In a pair of studies published in 1996 and 2001 (the second with several co-authors) I estimated the effects on the economy of an immediate switch to a low-rate, broad-based consumption tax that would raise the same amount of revenue as the current tax system. We found that lower marginal tax rates would increase employment and therefore expand production somewhat in the short run. Over a longer period of time, production would increase even more as the result of stronger capital accumulation induced by the more favorable tax treatment of savings…
Q.6: Adopting a consumption tax would hit the underground economy.
A: False. Drug dealers and others engaged in illegal economic activity currently evade income taxes but would have to pay taxes on their purchases under a consumption tax. The same is true for those engaged in legal economic activity who currently fail to report or pay taxes on their income. But the tax evaders also have customers, who currently pay income taxes before using their after-tax income to make purchases. Under a consumption tax, purchasers of illegal drugs would no longer have to pay income tax but would evade the consumption tax. The increased taxes on producers in the underground economy would be offset more or less by the reduced taxes on consumers in the underground economy.
Was this page helpful to you?
The Tax Foundation works hard to provide insightful tax policy analysis. Our work depends on support from members of the public like you. Would you consider contributing to our work?Contribute to the Tax Foundation
Let us know how we can better serve you!
We work hard to make our analysis as useful as possible. Would you consider telling us more about how we can do better?Give Us Feedback