Pittsburgh’s Battle of the Drink Tax Rages On
November 11, 2008
Business owners and activists in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, which includes the Pittsburgh metro area, have been fighting the county’s controversial drink tax for months. The 10% tax on drinks served in the county, along with a $2 per day car rental tax, was authorized last year with the purpose of providing $32 million annually in matching funds to Port Authority Transit, the company that provides mass transportation for the county. Groups like Friends Against Counterproductive Taxation (FACT) who oppose the drink tax had been working to get a referendum on last week’s election ballot. The referendum would have given voters the choice to reduce the drink tax significantly from 10% to 0.5%. Allegheny County officials responded by supporting a referendum that would have let voters choose to replace the drink tax with an increase in property taxes.
Both referenda were removed from the ballot when the county election board ruled that the ballot measures violated state law by seeking to overrule county tax policies. The issue was taken to the state’s Supreme Court which received legal briefs in early October concerning both ballot questions, but the Court declined to issue a directive concerning the ballot measures in time for the election. FACT is still hopeful however, as the state’s Supreme Court has agreed to hear appeals on the two referenda.
At the same time, Allegheny County Chief Executive Dan Onorato has proposed in his 2009 budget to reduce the drink tax to 7% and use any extra revenue to fund local infrastructure projects. But this plan has also been controversial. The Legislative Reference Bureau, which writes laws for Pennsylvania’s General Assembly, allowed the county to use the drink tax revenue for design and engineering work, road and bridge work, and debt service “as long as the costs are solely related to transit systems.” But a disagreement exists over whether “transit systems” can include general road and bridge projects that are unrelated to mass transit systems.
Was this page helpful to you?
The Tax Foundation works hard to provide insightful tax policy analysis. Our work depends on support from members of the public like you. Would you consider contributing to our work?Contribute to the Tax Foundation
Let us know how we can better serve you!
We work hard to make our analysis as useful as possible. Would you consider telling us more about how we can do better?Give Us Feedback