Pennsylvania is Scene of Disappointing Budget Deals
September 22, 2009
Pennsylvania has provided some depressing stories the past week. Three months after the end of the last fiscal year, the state has finally produced, not a budget, but a political agreement to produce a budget. As the Inquirer explains, Gov. Rendell’s proposed 50% income tax hike failed, but higher taxes on smokers and expanded gambling will fund his promised $300 million increase in education spending. Why should smokers and gamblers foot the bill for something that presumably benefits everyone? Besides, Pennsylvania has not been exactly depriving its full-time education workers – nationwide they ranked 12th highest in average compensation.
Expansion of the sales tax to some previously exempted entertainments may boost tax revenue as well. Theater, dance, music and performing arts are apparently on the hook while movies and sports events will continue exempt. This will no doubt consume most of the next two weeks of legislative infighting.
In Philadelphia, the budget deal was even worse. Once again from the Inquirer, the city will hike its sales tax to 8% (compared to 7% in Pittsburgh and 6% in the rest of the state). Then lawmakers showed just how completely they are blinding themselves to their long-term problems:
[The state permitted the city] to defer pension payments for the next two years. Those deferrals have to be paid back, with interest, beginning in 2013.
Another key pension provision extends the amortization period from 20 years to 30 years, in effect spreading the city’s pension burden over a longer period.
Unlike earlier versions of the bill, the legislation passed yesterday does not include any statewide pension changes or cap or cut back retirement benefits for current or future Philadelphia employees.
Labor leaders had campaigned vigorously against those provisions and persuaded the House to delete them from the bill.
Pennsylvania is already paying out $7 billion each year to retired government workers in pensions that were nowhere near close to adequately funded by employee contributions through the years. Once again from the Inquirer:
As critical as the legislation is to short-term needs, it does nothing to address the city’s systemic long-term problems, such as an underfunded pension system, fast-growing health-care costs, a large debt load, and an anemic tax base.
Was this page helpful to you?
The Tax Foundation works hard to provide insightful tax policy analysis. Our work depends on support from members of the public like you. Would you consider contributing to our work?Contribute to the Tax Foundation
Let us know how we can better serve you!
We work hard to make our analysis as useful as possible. Would you consider telling us more about how we can do better?Give Us Feedback