Pennsylvania Governor Plans to Raise the State Income Tax
June 17, 2009
The New York Times reports that Pennsylvania Gov. Edward Rendell (D) is proposing to raise the state’s individual income tax from 3.07 percent to 3.57 percent for three years, after which it will drop back down to today’s levels. Rendell justified this increase by stating that Pennsylvania has the second-lowest income tax among the 41 states that currently have one. On top of this, Rendell wants to increase per-pack cigarette tax by 10 cents, from $1.35 to $1.45, and he wants to raise an additional $50 million by taxing smokeless tobacco.
Rendell’s comments concerning Pennsylvanians’ tax burden are misleading. While Rendell cites the state tax burden as 41st among all states, the Tax Foundation’s State-Local Tax Burdens report calculates Pennsylvanian’s total state-local tax burden from all taxes at 10.2%. This is the 11th highest nationally, above the national average of 9.7%.
Rendell’s proposed 16% increase in the state’s flat income tax, combined with already high local income tax rates, would be a further burden on production and income in a tough time for Pennsylvania’s economy. High income earners might opt instead for Virginia, an hour away, with its significantly lower income tax rate, lower sales tax, lower property tax, and the lowest minimum wage in the country—not to mention the world’s oldest edible cured ham.
People heading for the highway wouldn’t be good for tax receipts over the long term. The Commonwealth Foundation projected that Rendell’s tax increase proposal would result in 23,960 fewer jobs next year. Combining the direct loss in income and the indirect effect of anti-growth policies, Pennsylvanians might start heading south this winter.
Was this page helpful to you?
The Tax Foundation works hard to provide insightful tax policy analysis. Our work depends on support from members of the public like you. Would you consider contributing to our work?Contribute to the Tax Foundation
Let us know how we can better serve you!
We work hard to make our analysis as useful as possible. Would you consider telling us more about how we can do better?Give Us Feedback