Ohio Senate Mulling Tax Changes, Good and Bad
June 19, 2015
This post originally appeared as an op-ed on Forbes here.
Ohio’s state budget has been in negotiation since January. Governor Kasich’s (R) original budget plan came in at a large fiscal cost because of hefty individual income tax cuts, but multiple structural components of the proposal—like a hike in the state’s Commercial Activity Tax—would prevent the plan from delivering on economic growth in the way income tax cuts normally would.
The House of Representatives responded by making several discernible improvementsin their proposed budget, mostly turning the tax plan into a slightly smaller individual income tax cut while scrapping the damaging revenue offsets. Though the House plan is still not perfect, the changes were a significant step in the right direction. In recent weeks, the Ohio Senate has countered with a bill that reincorporates some of the damaging parts of Gov. Kasich’s original proposal.
Excluding Pass-Through Income: It’s Foolhardy
One of these damaging elements is the Senate’s proposal to allow pass-through businesses like LLCs, S-corps, and sole proprietorships to deduct 100 percent of their income up to the first $250,000 in gross receipts and cap the tax rate of any additional revenues at a flat 3 percent.
While tax breaks for small businesses might play well in politics, the way this policy is structured just incentivizes wage-earners to reclassify themselves as contractor businesses in order to take advantage of the tax break. As one of us explained in testimony to the Ohio Committee on Ways and Means and in previous op-eds, if the District of Columbia, where we live, were to adopt the same policy, we could simply ask our employer to rehire us as a contractor, then file taxes as a sole proprietor, voiding our tax liability. The result? We wouldn’t add additional value or create any new jobs, but we would receive a huge tax break in return thanks to our new business classification.
Admittedly, this isn’t possible for every worker, but it does work for a lot of people on the margin. When Kansas enacted a similar pass-through exclusion (for all pass-through business income), the state estimated that 191,000 workers would receive the tax break. The result was almost twice as high – 330,000 Kansans took advantage and the state lost $207 million in revenues.
Swapping Income Tax Cuts for Cigarette Tax Hikes: Won’t Work for Long
The Senate’s bill does enact the same House-proposed broad-based personal income tax cuts of 6.3 percent, reducing the top rate from 5.33 percent to 4.99 percent, but would also increase the state’s cigarette tax from $1.25 to $1.65 a pack. This would move Ohio’s cigarette tax rate from the 28th highest in the nation to the 21st highest.
High cigarette taxes have the unintended consequence of leading to cigarette smuggling and tax evasion. This problem, coupled with the fact that cigarette taxes also represent a declining source of revenue, makes it very difficult to use cigarette taxes as a robust funding mechanism for important functions of government. These vital projects would be better funded by broad, predictable revenue sources, not unreliable, concentrated, and consequence-heavy sin taxes.
Again, this compromise is weaker than the House’s bill, which resisted Gov. Kasich’s $1 cigarette tax hike and new e-cigarette tax proposals. The Senate’s bill will not tax e-cigarettes, but does concede to a cigarette tax increase.
Reforming Ohio’s Gross Receipts Tax: It’s Overdue
So what should Ohio do? If the goal is to cut business costs, a more effective growth plan is to lower, or better yet, eliminate the state’s Commercial Activities Tax (CAT). Ohio employs the CAT, a gross receipts tax, as their form of corporate tax. The tax is structured such that it results in tax pyramiding, a damaging process where products and services are taxed multiple times throughout the production chain. Ohio is one of only five states to tax corporations in this way, and economists have denounced gross receipts taxes for centuries.
Gov. Kasich’s plan troubling suggested increasing the CAT, but the House and Senate proposals keep the rate at its current 0.26 percent. In the long-run, comprehensively revisiting the CAT will be necessary to bring the state in line with more competitive corporate tax structures.
In whole, the changes by the Ohio House and Senate to the original proposal put forward by Governor Kasich are welcomed, but there are still improvements to be made. The Senate is scheduled to vote on the bill on Wednesday, and it will be interesting to see how the House and Senate compromise their plans.
Was this page helpful to you?
The Tax Foundation works hard to provide insightful tax policy analysis. Our work depends on support from members of the public like you. Would you consider contributing to our work?Contribute to the Tax Foundation
Let us know how we can better serve you!
We work hard to make our analysis as useful as possible. Would you consider telling us more about how we can do better?Give Us Feedback