North Carolina Supreme Court Rules on Lottery Tax/Fee Case
On Friday, the North Carolina Supreme Court handed down its ruling in Heatherly v. State, the case determining whether the state lottery in part imposes a tax because its purpose is to raise money for broadly available government services. The Tax Foundation had filed an amicus curiae brief in the case, arguing that the lottery is subject to legislative requirements for passing taxes, and cited a number of authorities and caselaw on tax/fee distinctions. The case was argued last September.
One justice recused himself from the case for personal reasons, leaving six justices to decide the matter. However, they tied 3 to 3:
2009 WL 723503
PER CURIAM.
Justice MARTIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case. As to the appeal of right based on the dissenting opinion, the remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See, e.g., Barham v. Hawk, 360 N.C. 358, 625 S.E.2d 778 (2006).
In other words, the lower court decision automatically stands but is stripped of its authority for other cases. While it would have been preferable to get a strong ruling from North Carolina echoing rulings by other state courts, at least the troubling lower court decisions are now stripped of their authority beyond this one case.
Was this page helpful to you?
Thank you!
The Tax Foundation works hard to provide insightful tax policy analysis. Our work depends on support from members of the public like you. Would you consider contributing to our work?
Contribute to the Tax FoundationLet us know how we can better serve you!
We work hard to make our analysis as useful as possible. Would you consider telling us more about how we can do better?
Give Us Feedback