New Podcast: Attorney Edward Teyssier on Taxes vs. Fees in California
March 17, 2010
In this week’s podcast, my colleague Joe Henchman, the Tax Foundation’s Tax Counsel and Director of State Projects, interviews San Diego attorney Edward Teyssier, who spearheaded the charge against the city for collecting a “processing fee” associated with the city’s rental tax. In Weisblat v. City of San Diego, in which the Tax Foundation filed a friend-of-the-court brief, a California court ruled that the so-called “fee” was really an unconstitutional tax.
Teyssier discusses the case, its impact on similar “fees” elsewhere in the state as well as the important distinction between taxes and fees.
“I do think we have created some precedent because there were a number of other cities — in fact I think there still are a number of cities throughout the state of California — that either were charging a processing fee very similar to this or still are,” Teyssier says. “Since the case came down a lot of those cities have stopped collecting those fees and some who were thinking about imposing those fees have abandoned those concepts.”
For more, see Tax Foundation Fiscal Fact No. 160, “Charging Taxpayers for Tax Collection is a Tax: Weisblat v. City of San Diego“ or see the Tax Foundation’s amicus brief in the case.
Was this page helpful to you?
The Tax Foundation works hard to provide insightful tax policy analysis. Our work depends on support from members of the public like you. Would you consider contributing to our work?Contribute to the Tax Foundation
Let us know how we can better serve you!
We work hard to make our analysis as useful as possible. Would you consider telling us more about how we can do better?Give Us Feedback