New Education Finance Data Reveal New Jersey Spends Most Per Student
August 2, 2007
New data released by the National Center for Education Statistics, highlighted in a recent Tax Foundation Fiscal Fact, reveal that New Jersey has jumped up to number one in terms of per pupil spending. It’s no coincidence that the state also has the highest property tax collections per capita, as well as the highest median real estate taxes on owner-occupied housing, according to the Census Bureau (based on actual dollar amounts).
In the 2004-05 school year, the Garden State spent $14,117 in current expenditures per student. New York was second at $13,703 per student, followed by Connecticut, Vermont, and Rhode Island.
These high education spending numbers are made possible by New Jersey’s high taxes in nearly ever tax category. Typically a state will have a high tax on one item (like property or sales) and a low tax on another (like income). But New Jersey ranks among the highest taxed in almost every category. The state levies a very large general sales tax rate of 7 percent, following a hike about a year ago. (The national median is 5 percent.) As mentioned earlier, the state’s property taxes are ranked among the highest in the country by almost any measure. The corporate income tax is one of the highest in the country, and the individual income tax is in the top half when it comes to collections, but the top rate of 8.97 percent is 6th highest nationally.
In terms of excise taxes, you don’t want to be a smoker in New Jersey. The ridiculous $2.575 tax per pack is the nation’s highest. One area where New Jersey residents get a break is the gas tax—the 4th lowest nationally. However, the state makes up for that with its high toll collections—the second highest in the nation (per capita), behind only the state directly south of it, Delaware.
Given these high tax and spending numbers, taxpayers in New Jersey just have to ask the question: Are the high taxes we pay resulting in sufficiently high-quality government services relative to the reduced services we would be getting if we had lower taxes? If the answer is “yes,” then high taxes should stay. If the answer is “no,” then reducing taxes should be the state’s priority.
Was this page helpful to you?
The Tax Foundation works hard to provide insightful tax policy analysis. Our work depends on support from members of the public like you. Would you consider contributing to our work?Contribute to the Tax Foundation
Let us know how we can better serve you!
We work hard to make our analysis as useful as possible. Would you consider telling us more about how we can do better?Give Us Feedback