Kinsley Offers Criticism But No Solution to AMT Pickle
October 20, 2007
In what he calls a defense of the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT), Michael Kinsley in the Washington Post never gets around to telling us what lawmakers should do about it. Instead he contents himself with criticizing Senator Grassley for advocating repeal and President Bush for not having repealed it.
He makes one good observation though: “Tax deductions aren’t (or aren’t supposed to be) goodies distributed like candy on Halloween.”
That is so true, and the big piece of candy that Kinsley is talking about, though he doesn’t mention it, is the tax deduction for state-local taxes paid. That’s the deduction that most commonly forces taxpayers’ regular tax liability down so low that they get caught in the AMT net.
Every sensible tax reform plan ever published has suggested repealing the state-local deduction, and if the House and Senate and the President could bring themselves to follow that advice, they would improve the tax system, and with the extra revenue they could could cut other taxes or repeal the AMT. Without a state-local tax deduction, hardly anyone would still be stuck in the AMT anyway.
Was this page helpful to you?
The Tax Foundation works hard to provide insightful tax policy analysis. Our work depends on support from members of the public like you. Would you consider contributing to our work?Contribute to the Tax Foundation
Let us know how we can better serve you!
We work hard to make our analysis as useful as possible. Would you consider telling us more about how we can do better?Give Us Feedback