Indiana’s Gov. Pence Proposes Business Personal Property Tax Phase Out
December 20, 2013
Governor Pence of Indiana has in recent weeks proposed a phase-out of Indiana’s business personal property tax, which collected approximately $630 million in 2009; about 1.75 percent of state and local tax collections (tables 4 and 6 here). Business personal property taxes vary by state, but generally are levied on machinery, tools, equipment, even office furniture. This is a step toward better tax policy in a state that has already made serious strides toward a simpler, more neutral tax code. It’s also in line with a trend we’ve seen in recent years of states aiming to reduce taxes on tangible personal property.
Between 2000 and 2009, real collections from tangible personal property taxes decreased by 20 percent on average across the 50 states, and in Indiana, collections decreased by 69 percent. This is a good thing. While taxes on real property (land) are generally thought to be the least destructive taxes to growth, property taxes on equipment and machinery are taxes on capital. They distort the market against labor-saving innovations and make it more costly for businesses to implement new production procedures.
Reductions aren’t always a slam dunk politically though. Localities rely on the business personal property tax, and disrupting local revenues streams can be difficult. Last year, Florida and Arizona considered proposals to raise the exemption of their taxes on tangible personal property. The one in Florida was resoundingly voted by the legislature to be put on the ballot, but it failed a popular vote. The Arizona proposal also failed at the ballot box.
Gov. Pence has suggested at least two phase-out/down methods that we recommended in our 2012 study on tangible personal property taxes. The first is gradually raising the exemption level so that smaller businesses with less personal property don’t have to pay the tax. Currently, ten states have such “de minimis” exemptions. In Indiana though, businesses pay personal property taxes on the first dollar of capital they own. Even if repeal isn’t attainable, enacting at least some sort of exemption would curb some of the innovation-harming effects of the tax. The state could even consider enacting a filing threshold so that small businesses don’t have to go through any of the compliance issues associated with calculating all their business equipment and depreciating it every year. I would bet there are some small businesses with truly small tax bills that just create economic waste with how much time it takes to calculate and file them. Another option being floated that we wrote about in 2012 is exempting all new equipment purchases from the tax.
For now, the plan is in its infancy, but these are all good ideas here. We’ll be watching closely to see how this conversation develops.
By the way, did you hear that Indiana beat out Texas and jumped into the top ten of our State Business Tax Climate Index this year?
Also, see our recent testimony in Indiana on tax credits in the corporate code.
Follow Scott on Twitter.
Was this page helpful to you?
The Tax Foundation works hard to provide insightful tax policy analysis. Our work depends on support from members of the public like you. Would you consider contributing to our work?Contribute to the Tax Foundation
Let us know how we can better serve you!
We work hard to make our analysis as useful as possible. Would you consider telling us more about how we can do better?Give Us Feedback