# How Would the Fiscal Cliff Affect Typical Families Across the Country?

December 10, 2012

Recently, we released an analysis looking at the potential total tax increase on the median four-person family in each state.[1] We found that higher income and lower states tended to be affected more than middle income states—higher income states from AMT changes and lower income states from the Bush tax cuts. Sufficient data exists for us to repeat this analysis based on Census MSAs (metropolitan statistical areas) using the IRS’s income tax by ZIP code information.[2]

We used this data to estimate itemized deductions as a percentage of household income for all income groups in each MSA, using national aggregates to adjust for family size. We then used American Community Survey data on median household incomes by family size,[3] looking specifically at four-person families, and applied the deduction percentages for the income group into which the median family would fall to that family’s household income.[4]

The final step was to take these numbers and run them through our Fiscal Cliff tax calculator, which is available online at www.mytaxburden.com. We calculated tax liability under 2011 law (the most recent year that an AMT patch was in effect) and 2013 law assuming full expiration of all expiring tax cuts. We assume each family takes the standard deduction unless our predicted deduction amount exceeds it.[5]

 Table 1. Most Affected Metropolitan Areas City State Median Household Income for 4-Person Family Tax Increase As % of Income Rank McAllen-Edinburg-Mission TX \$36,104 \$2,938 8.14% 1 College Station-Bryan TX \$38,292 \$3,091 8.07% 2 Brownsville-Harlingen TX \$38,808 \$3,127 8.06% 3 Laredo TX \$39,062 \$3,145 8.05% 4 Hinesville-Fort Stewart GA \$39,183 \$3,153 8.05% 5 Corvallis OR \$39,775 \$3,195 8.03% 6 Lake Havasu City-Kingman AZ \$39,802 \$3,197 8.03% 7 Hot Springs AR \$42,648 \$3,396 7.96% 8 Visalia-Porterville CA \$43,554 \$3,338 7.67% 9 Danville VA \$43,838 \$3,291 7.51% 10 Trenton-Ewing NJ \$110,065 \$7,729 7.02% 11 Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk CT \$115,121 \$7,803 6.78% 12 San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont CA \$110,431 \$7,424 6.72% 13 Poughkeepsie-Newburgh-Middletown NY \$101,197 \$6,754 6.67% 14 Baltimore-Towson MD \$105,055 \$6,927 6.59% 15 Boston-Cambridge-Quincy MA-NH \$106,326 \$6,905 6.49% 16 Spartanburg SC \$45,747 \$2,930 6.40% 17 Washington-Arlington-Alexandria DC-VA-MD-WV \$115,519 \$7,370 6.38% 18 Carson City NV \$46,019 \$2,872 6.24% 19 Madera-Chowchilla CA \$46,366 \$2,875 6.20% 20
 Table 2. Least Affected Metropolitan Areas City State Median Household Income for 4-Person Family Tax Increase As % of Income Rank Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill NC-SC \$76,547 \$3,261 4.26% 347 Detroit-Warren-Livonia MI \$76,894 \$3,268 4.25% 348 Kankakee-Bradley IL \$79,777 \$3,389 4.25% 349 Iowa City IA \$77,078 \$3,272 4.24% 350 San Luis Obispo-Paso Robles CA \$77,164 \$3,273 4.24% 351 Indianapolis-Carmel IN \$77,474 \$3,279 4.23% 352 York-Hanover PA \$77,505 \$3,280 4.23% 353 Birmingham-Hoover AL \$77,538 \$3,281 4.23% 354 Colorado Springs CO \$78,523 \$3,300 4.20% 355 Mount Vernon-Anacortes WA \$78,569 \$3,301 4.20% 356 Fort Collins-Loveland CO \$79,470 \$3,319 4.18% 357 Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News VA-NC \$79,762 \$3,325 4.17% 358 Santa Rosa-Petaluma CA \$80,146 \$3,333 4.16% 359 San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos CA \$80,323 \$3,336 4.15% 360 Grand Junction CO \$80,491 \$3,340 4.15% 361 Palm Coast FL \$80,998 \$3,350 4.14% 362 Dover DE \$81,634 \$3,363 4.12% 363 Santa Cruz-Watsonville CA \$81,694 \$3,364 4.12% 364 Napa CA \$83,025 \$3,391 4.08% 365 Bremerton-Silverdale WA \$84,692 \$3,434 4.05% 366

The results confirm the same pattern we found in our state-by-state analysis. The twenty hardest hit metropolitan areas are a mixture of very low-income and high-income areas of the country; the list includes both McAllen, Texas (with a median four-person household income of \$36,104) as well as the Washington, DC metro area (with a median four-person household income of \$115,519.) Low income families are affected by a number of targeted refundable tax credits that are set to be dramatically reduced should the Bush tax cuts expire, primarily the Earned Income Tax Credit (where a significant marriage penalty is set to return) and the Child Tax Credit (which will be cut in half and made mostly nonrefundable, meaning the credit value cannot exceed income tax liability.) Higher income families should pay attention to what happens with the AMT—if there is no patch for this year or next, the AMT exemption will revert to levels originally set in 1993, and the resulting large tax increase will catch many taxpayers by surprise. The AMT is not well reflected in the IRS’s withholding tables, and many of these families have never had to worry about the AMT before.

The full results are shown in the accompanying table and can be downloaded in Excel format here.

[1] Nick Kasprak, How Would the Fiscal Cliff Affect Typical Families in Each State?, Tax Foundation Fiscal Fact No. 341 (Nov. 12, 2012), https://taxfoundation.org/article/how-would-fiscal-cliff-affect-typical-families-each-state.

[2] Internal Revenue Service, SOI Tax Stats – Individual Income Tax Statistics – ZIP Code Data (SOI), http://www.irs.gov/uac/SOI-Tax-Stats—Individual-Income-Tax-Statistics—ZIP-Code-Data-(SOI).

[3] American Community Survey, 2011 1-Year Estimates, Table B19119.

[4] One caveat with this method is that a significant number of MSAs include areas from multiple states, which could have differing local tax rates. In these cases, deduction amounts (particularly for state and local income taxes) could differ significantly from state to state, and our estimate is somewhat of an average.

[5] Some families would take the standard deduction in 2011 but would itemize under a 2013 fiscal cliff scenario since the standard deduction for married filers would be reduced.

Thank You!

The Tax Foundation works hard to provide insightful tax policy analysis. Our work depends on support from members of the public like you. Would you consider contributing to our work?