Fiscal Cliff Resolved, Still Likely to Get Downgraded
January 2, 2013
Moody’s reports it’s a happy new year:
Moody's Investors Service said that the fiscal package passed by both houses of Congress yesterday is a further step in clarifying the medium-term deficit and debt trajectory of the federal government. It does not, however, provide a basis for a meaningful improvement in the government's debt ratios over the medium term. The rating agency expects that further fiscal measures are likely to be taken in coming months that would result in lower future budget deficits, which are necessary if the negative outlook on the government's bond rating is to be returned to stable. On the other hand, lack of further deficit reduction measures could affect the rating negatively. Notably, yesterday's package does not address the federal government's statutory debt limit, which was reached on December 31. The need to raise the debt limit may affect the outcome of future budget negotiations.
Although the fiscal package raises some revenue through higher tax rates on individuals earning more than $400,000 ($450,000 for joint filers) and through some other smaller measures, the estimated amount of increased revenue over the next decade is far outweighed by the amount of revenue foregone through the extension of lower tax rates for those with incomes below $400,000, the indexation of the alternative minimum tax, and other measures.
The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates that the net increase in budget deficits from the fiscal package when compared to its baseline scenario (which assumes taxes on all income levels would increase) is about $4 trillion over the coming decade, excluding higher interest costs on the resultant higher debt. Based on that estimate, a preliminary calculation by Moody's shows that the ratio of government debt to GDP would peak at about 80% in 2014 and then remain in the upper 70 percent range for the remaining years of the coming decade. Stabilization at this level would leave the government less able to deal with future pressures from entitlement spending or from unforeseen shocks. Thus, further measures that bring about a downward debt trajectory over the medium term are likely to be needed to support the Aaa rating.
Moody’s warned last year there would be a downgrade in 2013 if the debt to GDP ratio was not put on a downward trajectory. That would mean GDP has to grow at a faster rate than the debt. The chart below shows that deficits according to the CBO will range from $568 billion to $942 billion over the next 10 years. Notice the deficits climb in the last 5 years of this window, reaching $818 billion in 2022. Note that CBO has not budgeted here many of the big ticket items that tend to show up, such as Hurricane Sandy at about $60 billion in 2013, or the perennial “doc fix” at about $30 billion. Essentially, a realistic view points to deficits closer to $1 trillion every year for the next decade.
Then there is economic growth. The CBO assumes GDP grows more than 6 percent in 2015 and 2016, outstripping the growth in the debt. That would be nice, but our analysis and many others indicate that may be optimistic. We find the fiscal cliff deal reduces GDP about 1.45 percent, once all of the changes take effect, with a commensurate reduction in private business stocks, wages, and hours worked. This lost GDP means lower actual, or dynamic, revenue than is projected by CBO. We find 64 percent of the projected static revenue will not materialize, due to these factors. This does not count income shifting, such as fewer capital gains realizations, which is likely to further reduce revenues.
Bottom line, Moody’s will very likely downgrade U.S. debt if the present course continues. The debt ceiling negotiations, occurring over the next couple months, could avoid that scenario through some combination of large spending cuts and alternative revenues that are less damaging to the economy.
Follow William McBride on Twitter @EconoWill
Was this page helpful to you?
The Tax Foundation works hard to provide insightful tax policy analysis. Our work depends on support from members of the public like you. Would you consider contributing to our work?Contribute to the Tax Foundation
Let us know how we can better serve you!
We work hard to make our analysis as useful as possible. Would you consider telling us more about how we can do better?Give Us Feedback