Donald Trump’s Plan is Missing a Pillar of Tax Reform
June 20, 2016
Broader bases and lower rates: these are the two pillars of tax reform. Unfortunately, when it comes to reforming America’s tax code, Donald Trump’s tax plan has only half of the blueprint; while Mr. Trump’s plan slashes tax rates across the board, it fails to broaden the tax base to make up for lost revenue.
First of all, what is meant by “broader bases and lower rates”? Simply put, this means lowering marginal tax rates while simultaneously increasing the amount of the economy subject to taxation, in order to keep revenues in line. My colleague Scott Greenberg puts it best in his report on Options for Broadening the U.S. Tax Base: “the only practical way to cut tax rates without increasing the deficit is by broadening the tax base.”
Why are lower rates desirable in the first place? As Greenberg finds, “high marginal rates slow economic growth and hurt international competitiveness.” Combining lower rates with a broader base “creates a simpler and more equitable tax code, by ending preferential tax treatment for certain economic activities… [and can] encourage a more efficient allocation of resources.”
Donald Trump’s tax plan successfully lowers tax rates, as seen in our analysis of his plan. He cuts the top ordinary income tax rate from 39.6% to 25%, the federal tax rate on corporate income from 35% to 15%, and eliminates estate taxes altogether. These lower marginal rates are the part of tax reform that Mr. Trump has right, but he fails to address the need for broader tax bases.
In fact, Mr. Trump significantly narrows the tax base by exempting the first $25,000 of income for single filers and $50,000 for married filers. Trump’s plan states that this “removes nearly 75 million households – over 50% – from the income tax rolls.” This means that not only are people facing lower marginal tax rates, but a considerable amount are paying no income taxes at all.
This is a major reason why Mr. Trump’s tax plan, if enacted, would hemorrhage federal revenue. Specifically, we project that Trump’s tax plan reduces revenue by $11.98 trillion over 10 years on a static basis, and $10.14 trillion on a dynamic basis after accounting for economic growth that may occur under his plan from the lower rates. According to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, the economy would have to grow at a sustained 8% annual rate for 10 years to make Trump’s proposal revenue-neutral. Such growth rates in the United States have never been seen in the last century.
Furthermore, Trump’s plan barely touches any of the large tax expenditures, such as the home mortgage interest deduction, in order to broaden the tax base. One base-broadener he did include is taxing carried interest as ordinary income; he directed substantial attention towards this proposal, but it raises a comparative drop in the revenue bucket—up to $15 billion over 10 years—according to our latest book, Options for Reforming America's Tax Code. The carried interest provision is worth only 0.15% of the Trump plan’s lost revenue, at best. In contrast, the same book shows that elimination of the largest tax expenditure—the exclusion of employer-sponsored health insurance payments from taxable income—would raise more than $3 trillion, substantially mitigating the revenue losses of a rate-cutting plan.
Donald Trump’s plan to lower marginal tax rates is a worthwhile goal that should be considered in any serious tax reform plan. However, by failing to broaden the tax base, Mr. Trump’s plan misses the mark of true tax reform, and would lead to a ballooning federal deficit if enacted. In order to mitigate the revenue losses from his rate-cutting proposals, Mr. Trump should consider including more substantial base-broadening measures in his plan.
Was this page helpful to you?
The Tax Foundation works hard to provide insightful tax policy analysis. Our work depends on support from members of the public like you. Would you consider contributing to our work?Contribute to the Tax Foundation
Let us know how we can better serve you!
We work hard to make our analysis as useful as possible. Would you consider telling us more about how we can do better?Give Us Feedback