Cell Taxes and the Black Market
June 8, 2005
Telecom taxes are increasingly becoming an area of tax policy that is under scrutiny for being complicated, punitive, and unfair. Taxes perceived as unfair generate greater incentives to avoid the tax. For example, a reporter from Forbes Magazine describes how he avoids high cell phone taxes (for full article click here):
Since it was clear I’d have to lose my coveted New York number to avoid Verizon-levied taxes, I changed to an Idaho number, provided an Idaho address, then promptly turned around and requested paperless billing, which I paid from my Los Angeles address. Since my fake move, my monthly bill has shown a tiny Idaho tax of about $1.15 per month. At that rate I figure I am saving about $60 per year.
The incentive to avoid taxation is increased when the complexity and rate of a tax increase. Cell phone taxes are not the only taxes which drive people into the black market. High cigarette taxes, for example, do as well. Improving technology makes borders more artificial and provides further incentives for people to avoid high or complex taxes. Read the Tax Foundation’s new paper by Dr. Richard Wagner on how technology is making borders weaker to learn more.
Was this page helpful to you?
The Tax Foundation works hard to provide insightful tax policy analysis. Our work depends on support from members of the public like you. Would you consider contributing to our work?Contribute to the Tax Foundation
Let us know how we can better serve you!
We work hard to make our analysis as useful as possible. Would you consider telling us more about how we can do better?Give Us Feedback