AFL-CIO’s Arguments Against “Cadillac Tax” Typical Special Interest Nonsense
January 11, 2010
I have to admit. Watching the in-fighting among Democrats on the issue of whether or not high-valued health insurance plans should be taxed to pay for health care reform is rather amusing.
Unions are in the rare position of opposing a tax increase, while the White House is now endorsing a tax plan that candidate Obama villified his opponent for supporting in the 2008 election (with the large financial support of the labor unions). The Obama/Biden attack on McCain’s proposal to tax health insurance benefits was a campaign of dishonesty from start to finish.
And now we sit here with the unions making the following argument: we accepted lower wages in exchange for greater health insurance benefits and now you are going to tax those benefits.
First off, the unions are acknowledging that they have long pushed to have a large fraction of their compensation be in non-tax form. They are just now upset that some of that currently-free compensation will be taxed. These are the same unions that will villify legal tax loopholes taken by high-income earners (and would support almost any retroactive tax increase on them as well…ask the AFL-CIO if it supports a retroactive increase in the estate tax for 2010 to pay for health care reform).
It’s also funny to hear unions acknowledging that they have accepted benefits in lieu of wages as a form of compensation. These are the same unions who have constantly cited statistics about how wages have been stagnant in recent years, conveniently ignoring the value of increased benefits that have taken place during that same time period.
The ideal solution would be for politicians to not listen to hypocritical special interests like the AFL-CIO and pursue a better health care reform bill that does indeed address the tax-exclusion for health insurance benefits via the income tax, among other things. But if the Democrats are going to pass health reform, an excise tax on health insurance benefits is superior to a 5.4 percent surtax arbitrarily imposed on high-income people to pay for health reform that Democrats claim will benefit society as a whole.
Was this page helpful to you?
The Tax Foundation works hard to provide insightful tax policy analysis. Our work depends on support from members of the public like you. Would you consider contributing to our work?Contribute to the Tax Foundation
Let us know how we can better serve you!
We work hard to make our analysis as useful as possible. Would you consider telling us more about how we can do better?Give Us Feedback