Is the State and Local Tax Deduction in Place to Protect Against Double Taxation?
September 21, 2017
A few stories are in the news today about the state and local tax deduction, a provision of the federal income tax system that allows taxpayers who itemize to deduct some of their state and local taxes paid from their federal taxable income, lowering their total tax burden.
This deduction is really bad policy for about a dozen reasons that my colleague Jared Walczak laid out in a fantastic paper released earlier this year. However, one of the reasons this policy seems to stick around is that a lot of folks think that the deduction is in place to protect against double taxation. Interest groups that want the policy retained for whatever reason stoke the flames of this misconception—for example, a coalition called “Americans Against Double Taxation” launched just today.
The problem is that their assertion is bunk. Jared’s findings:
In a federal system, moreover, individuals receive services from federal, state, and municipal governments. Each layer of government can be viewed as providing its own package of services, which one would expect to be “priced” separately. When two taxes levied by a single government, or similar types of governments (for instance, multiple states), fall disproportionately upon the same income or economic activity, this represents a clear case of double taxation. When different levels of governments levy taxes for discrete sets of services, the rationale for a deduction for taxes paid is far weaker.
Or as my colleague Kyle Pomerleau notes in less than 140 characters:
— Kyle Pomerleau (@kpomerleau) September 21, 2017
Imagine if we applied this faulty line of thinking to other tax types. Most states have both state and local sales taxes. What if we demanded that we be allowed to deduct our local sales taxes paid against our state tax liability on the same transaction? What if we demanded the ability to deduct our municipal property tax payments from our county property tax assessed value? We don’t do either of these things, because the revenue is going to different government entities to pay for different things.
Repealing the state and local tax deduction carve-out will be an important part of pro-growth tax reform. Eliminating the deduction would free up $1.8 trillion to use for lowering rates across the board. Special interest groups will want you to think this deduction protects you against double taxation. Don’t fall for it.
Was this page helpful to you?
The Tax Foundation works hard to provide insightful tax policy analysis. Our work depends on support from members of the public like you. Would you consider contributing to our work?Contribute to the Tax Foundation
Let us know how we can better serve you!
We work hard to make our analysis as useful as possible. Would you consider telling us more about how we can do better?Give Us Feedback
- Center for Federal Tax Policy
- Center for State Tax Policy
- New Jersey
- New York
- High-Income Taxpayers, Progressivity, and Inequality
- Individual and Consumption Taxes
- Individual Income and Payroll Taxes
- Individual Tax Compliance and Complexity
- Individual Tax Expenditures, Credits, and Deductions