The OECD released their Revenue Statistics publication for 2015 this week, revealing the total tax revenue as a percent of GDP of the OECD countries has risen by 10 bases points. The increased tax revenue was driven by...
- The Tax Policy Blog
- Ohio Considers Changes to Complex Municipal Tax Codes
Ohio Considers Changes to Complex Municipal Tax Codes
Ohio has a history of poor tax policy that negatively affects its business climate. In an attempt to improve its performance, the Ohio House Ways and Means Committee is considering a bill that would change Ohio’s municipal tax structure. Right now, Ohio allows its municipalities to levy both individual and business income taxes. Additionally, each municipality gets to write its own regulations and rules for things like employee withholding and how to calculate penalties.
Because each municipality is creating its own rules, businesses that have to file in multiple places have to comply with entirely different sets of rules, leading to increased compliance costs. Tax compliance often requires businesses to hire outside professionals to interpret the tax code and ensure that all the rules are being followed. For small businesses, this is a costly endeavor that in Ohio is leading to them often paying more in administrative costs than they owe in actual taxes. Placing such severe burdens on small businesses keeps them from flourishing and leads to a bad business environment with low incentives for both starting businesses and for existing businesses to stay (Ohio scores 39thin our State Business Tax Climate Index for FY 2013). HB 601 would be a step toward a simpler and more uniform tax code that would prevent the confusing and costly base differences between municipalities.
To help increase uniformity, HB 601 would also set a standard for net operating loss carry forwards. “Carry forwards” allow businesses to take a net loss from one year and use it to offset the net income of another year on its tax forms. In Ohio, each municipality sets the rule with some allowing up to five years of NOL carry forward and some allowing none. This prevents neutrality because some businesses create consistent profit every year while others have years of loss followed by profit. Making one rule for carry forwards in the state will allow businesses to treat their net income the same across all municipalities, reducing complicated compliance issues.
Get Email Updates from the Tax Foundation
Join the Tax Foundation's fight for sound tax policy Go
About the Tax Policy Blog
The Tax Policy Blog is the official blog of the Tax Foundation, a non-partisan, non-profit research organization that has monitored tax policy at the federal, state and local levels since 1937. Our economists welcome your feedback. If you would like to send an e-mail to the author of a blog post, please click on that person's name to locate his or her e-mail address or visit our staff page here.
Recent Blog Posts
Related State Articles
- Lunch Links: Deficit Dilemma Debated; First-Year $$$ Projection Topped from Nevada Gross Receipts Tax; State Ballot Initiatives Analyzed
- Lunch Links: Under Amour Wants Baltimore to Finance Transformation of Area to House New Headquarters; Wisconsin Governor, Fellow Republicans in Legislature Announce Tax Reform Proposals; New Tax Foundation Tool to Compare Congressional Tax Plans
- Lunch Links: Republican Plan Upcoming for Sales Tax on Internet Buys; Walmart Avoids Excessive Tax Proposed by Puerto Rico; Explaining Why States Should Index Tax Brackets for Inflation
- 1 of 40
- next ›