Today, for the first time in ten years, the U.S. House of Representatives has voted to repeal the federal estate tax. The final vote on HR 1105 was 240-179, with 233 Republicans and 7 Democrats voting yea. The bill was...
- The Tax Policy Blog
- New Jersey Once Again Considers Tax on High Earners
New Jersey Once Again Considers Tax on High Earners
The state of New Jersey is once again hearing calls for a “millionaire’s tax,” with State Senate President Stephen Sweeney (D) saying he is “dead serious” in wanting to impose a millionaire’s tax, and that tax hikes should be “on the table” in New Jersey’s ongoing budget debate. This isn’t the first time in recent years that New Jersey has seen debate on this topic: Governor Christie (R) has vetoed tax increases on high-earners three times before. It’s also not the first millionaire tax proposal in the states we’ve seen this year. One prominent proposal in Illinois to tax millionaires in order to increase education spending, for example, recently failed.
These “millionaires’ taxes” are poor policy, as we’ve explained numerous times in the past. They are narrow, high-rate taxes on a mobile group of people, and the spending such a tax increase supports leads to voters mistakenly thinking they got “something for nothing.” U.S. Senator Russell B. Long (D-LA) famously quipped that this kind of tax policymaking was merely “Don’t tax you, don’t tax me, tax that fellow behind the tree!”
Yes, such taxes will generally raise revenue in the short term without an abrupt exodus of wealthy people fleeing to the state next door (especially when the states next door also have fairly high taxes). But over the longer term, higher taxes can negatively impact the Garden State’s economy by discouraging firms from locating or expanding in New Jersey instead of other possible locations, or by incentivizing outward migration for upwardly mobile workers and entrepreneurs.
Beyond that, states don’t get into fiscal trouble just because of their tax codes. As we’ve explained before, a state's public finance record is partly influenced by revenue, but also by tax structures (volatile taxes like progressive income taxes encourage overspending in good economic times, causing a deficit during economic contractions), spending policy, division of responsibilities with the federal and local governments, and financial management. New Jersey is already one of the highest-taxed states in the nation (indeed, it was tied for the last Tax Freedom Day this year), with the 6th highest state and local taxes per capita, and 7th highest state and local total revenues per capita. With such funding levels, the source of New Jersey’s fiscal woes is likely more to do with too-high spending levels than too-low taxes.
Read more on New Jersey here.
Read more on Millionaire Taxes here.
Follow Lyman on Twitter.
Subscribe to the Tax Foundation Newsletter
We will never sell or share your information with third parties.
Join the Tax Foundation's fight for sound tax policy Go
About the Tax Policy Blog
The Tax Policy Blog is the official blog of the Tax Foundation, a non-partisan, non-profit research organization that has monitored tax policy at the federal, state and local levels since 1937. Our economists welcome your feedback. If you would like to send an e-mail to the author of a blog post, please click on that person's name to locate his or her e-mail address or visit our staff page here.