Last week, the Tax Policy Center held an event called “Measuring the Distribution of Federal Spending and Taxes.” At this event, Gerald Prante presented his findings from the Tax Foundation study called “A Distributional...
- The Tax Policy Blog
- LivingSocial Wants a Discount to Stay in D.C.
LivingSocial Wants a Discount to Stay in D.C.
Back in April 2012, the Washington Post reported that LivingSocial, the D.C.-based tech startup that connects its users to local deals and events, was being offered $32.5 million in tax incentives over 5 years by Mayor Gray. These incentives would only kick in if LivingSocial hired more employees and established a large, concentrated corporate headquarters. At the time, LivingSocial had 956 employees in the District, and was expected to hire 1,000 more.
But as the Post now reports, these big plans came to nothing. LivingSocial has actually shrunk to about 600 employees, and has shed office space rather than acquiring new space. Luckily, D.C. taxpayers won’t be subsidizing a failing firm: the tax incentives can only be used if LivingSocial meets certain thresholds for hiring and office expansion.
However, this narrative speaks to the larger irrationalities that permeate the weird world of tax incentives. LivingSocial wants tax incentives to stay in D.C. because it’s a very expensive town, so they agitate for subsidies while other taxpayers foot the full freight of D.C.’s high tax bills. As more firms get these sorts of carve-outs, the tax base gets smaller, necessitating higher rates to pull in the same amount of revenue. This, in turn, makes operating in D.C. more expensive.
This is also a classic case of tax incentives distorting economic decisions. Without incentives, LivingSocial might operate somewhere cheaper. As an online-centric firm, location can be flexible, hence why some Silicon Valley firms have recently moved to lower-cost locations like Boise, Idaho.
Tax incentives are a way that the government tries to play venture capitalist. But, as in the case of LivingSocial, it often doesn’t work. Even when it does “work,” it may actually be a net loss for the economy as the company operates in a less efficient location, and the tax incentives used will have to be financed by higher taxes on the rest of the tax base, who could have put that capital to better use.
More on the District here.
Buy this blogger a cup of coffee!
Join the Tax Foundation's fight for sound tax policy Go
About the Tax Policy Blog
The Tax Policy Blog is the official weblog of the Tax Foundation, a non-partisan, non-profit research organization that has monitored tax policy at the federal, state and local levels since 1937. Our economists welcome your feedback. If you would like to send an e-mail to the author of a blog post, please click on that person's name to locate his or her e-mail address or visit our staff page here.