Many people are beginning to wrap their minds around the House Republicans’ proposed destination-based cash-flow tax and what it means for tax reform. Most people are still looking into the tax’s impacts on trade and how...
- The Tax Policy Blog
- Iowa Approves Property Tax Reductions, New Tax Credits
Iowa Approves Property Tax Reductions, New Tax Credits
A new tax package in Iowa has been signed into law, constituting, according to Governor Branstad (R), Iowa’s biggest tax cut ever. SF 295 has three major components: reduction in business property taxes, limitations on increases of residential property taxes, and credit expansions in individual income taxes. These changes are expected to reduce taxes by over $4 billion over the course of the next decade.
As much as Iowans may like their tax break, the reform itself includes provisions that raise some concern. While we have speculated before about why taxpayers so dislike the property tax, the tax itself has many positive features. Property taxes fulfill many of the principles of sound tax policy: they are usually relatively simple, easy to understand and transparent, can readily be made economically neutral, and provide reasonably stable revenue flows: all positive features.
Iowa’s new tax law, however, has a mixed record on these principles. As of 2012, commercial property in Iowa was taxed at about 2.25 times the rate of residential property: ranked 40th out of the 50 states. Thus, a relative reduction in business property taxes could, theoretically, make the tax code more neutral. While SF 295 does offer such a relative reduction, it is hard to say how large it will be: the relationship between exempting a share of commercial property’s value from and reducing assessment growth for residential properties is complicated. A better proposal would have been to simply move away from separate tax categories for residential versus commercial property, such as the system established under Proposition 13 in California, which has one of the most neutral property taxation systems in the nation.
However, the large reduction in property taxes coupled with a smaller reduction in income taxes will shift the burden of taxation more heavily onto income: a less stable and more distortionary tax. Furthermore, SF 295 creates or expands several new credits, funds, and preferential treatments in the tax code, exacerbating the problem of non-neutrality, and its distortionary effects.
In sum, the law is a mixed bag. The Governor has indicated another look will be taken at the income tax later this year: hopefully the problem of excessive and distortionary credits can be resolved then. And, if not, then Iowa may have to sit tight at 42nd on our State Business Tax Climate Index, maintaining the 4th highest top income tax in the nation, and the highest corporate tax rate.
Get Email Updates from the Tax Foundation
Join the Tax Foundation's fight for sound tax policy Go
About the Tax Policy Blog
The Tax Policy Blog is the official blog of the Tax Foundation, a non-partisan, non-profit research organization that has monitored tax policy at the federal, state and local levels since 1937. Our economists welcome your feedback. If you would like to send an e-mail to the author of a blog post, please click on that person's name to locate his or her e-mail address or visit our staff page here.
Recent Blog Posts
Related State Articles
- Lunch Links: Trump Tax Vision Addressed; Wisconsin's Walker New Head of Republican Governors Association; Tax Reform on Iowa Senate Agenda
- Lunch Links: Raising Gas Taxes A 'Non-Issue' for Incumbents in Iowa Legislative Races; High-Income Earner Taxes on Ballot in California and Maine; Corporate Tax Breaks for Housing, Development Projects Cost NYC $3 Billion
- Lunch Links: Justice Department Charges Those Defrauding Americans of $300M in IRS Phone Scams; Christie Criticizes Lt. Governor on Transportation Revenue Stance; More TV Series Move to Hollywood for Tax Benefits
- 1 of 22
- next ›