Regular readers of Tax Foundation reports know that we publish estimates of the distributional impact of federal tax changes: that is, we estimate how a tax reform might affect the after-tax incomes of taxpayers at...
- The Tax Policy Blog
- Illinois Speaker Madigan Proposes 3 Percent High-Earner Tax
Illinois Speaker Madigan Proposes 3 Percent High-Earner Tax
On Thursday, Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan proposed a 3 percent “additional income tax” constitutional amendment for earners with incomes over $1 million. Currently, Illinois’ income tax rate is 5 percent for all income levels, and, according to current law, it is scheduled to fall to 3.75 percent on January 1, 2015.
Illinois has been debating progressive income tax proposals for some time now, with previous proposals including top rates ranging from 9 percent to 11 percent. Illinois’ current flat tax is protected by the state’s constitution, and thus a move to a progressive tax would require a supermajority of the legislature and a referendum in November. The tax increase would be retroactive to January 1, 2014.
Madigan’s plan differs from others in that it ties a rate proposal to the progressive tax constitutional amendment and dedicates the revenues to public services. Other tax increase proposals in Illinois have not tied the constitutional amendment’s passage to a specific rate structure: they’ve proposed amendments giving broad powers to Illinois policymakers to make a progressive income tax at their discretion, and left rate structures vague. Madigan’s proposal specifically sets a 3 percent additional rate above the normal income tax rate and ties revenue raised from the tax to school districts to be distributed on a per pupil basis.
With numerous tax plans floated for Illinois, it’s not clear what the final plans put before voters may be. Governor Quinn will deliver his budget address on March 26th, where presumably his tax plan will be laid out. But whatever the case, a “millionaires’ tax” is poor policy: it is a narrow, high-rate tax on a highly mobile group of people who earn less in bad economic times. The spending such a tax increase supports leads to the cost of government being hidden from most people and shouldered by a few, making revenues even more volatile and narrowly-based.
It’s true that high-earner taxes will can raise revenue in the short term, but eventually, the taxes can negatively impact location decisions. Illinois is already struggling to keep many of its prominent companies and experiencing slower than average job growth. With a higher tax on individuals and many businesses, people expanding old businesses or creating new ones will incorporate the higher cost of doing business into their decision-making, and could choose to steer clear of the state.
Read more on Illinois here.
Read more on high-earner taxes here.
Follow Lyman on Twitter.
Get Email Updates from the Tax Foundation
Join the Tax Foundation's fight for sound tax policy Go
About the Tax Policy Blog
The Tax Policy Blog is the official blog of the Tax Foundation, a non-partisan, non-profit research organization that has monitored tax policy at the federal, state and local levels since 1937. Our economists welcome your feedback. If you would like to send an e-mail to the author of a blog post, please click on that person's name to locate his or her e-mail address or visit our staff page here.
Recent Blog Posts
Related State Articles
- Lunch Links: Speaker Ryan Lays Out Vision for Tax Reform; Compromise Part of Latest New Jersey Tax Proposal; Pennsylvania Legislators Target Reduction of 40 Percent E-Cigarette Tax; Rundown of Marijuana Ballot Propositions in Five States
- Lunch Links: Beverage Industry Sues to Prevent Soda Tax in Philly; Chicago City Council Imposes Hefty Water/Sewer Tax to Aid Unfunded Pension Liability; TF Models Effects of Past Tax Legislation
- Lunch Links: U.S. Treasury vs. European Tax Probe; Alabama, South Carolina Study Tax Changes; Pennsylvania Vape Tax A Job-Killer
- 1 of 65
- next ›