As the tax reform debate begins to heat up, businesses and investors are beginning to pay closer attention to the House GOP Tax Reform Blueprint, a tax plan released last June by Speaker Paul Ryan and House Ways and...
- The Tax Policy Blog
- Georgia Senate Approves Flat Tax
Georgia Senate Approves Flat Tax
It began as a tax incentive for aquariums, but the Georgia Senate had bigger fish to fry. Last week, on a 35-17 vote, the state senate approved legislation that would replace the state’s current individual income tax schedule with a flat tax of 5.4 percent.
The state’s current individual income tax structure shows its age. A six bracket graduated rate tax, its top bracket kicks in at $7,000. The current bracket structure, with minor adjustments, dates to 1937. Of course, times have changed. These days, Georgia individual filers with taxable income less than $7,000 only responsible for about $1 million in collections. Filers with $7,000 or more in taxable income save $230—a decent sum—by having their first $7,000 exposed to lower rates.
As amended, Georgia HB 238 replaces the state’s six bracket income tax (with a top rate of 6.0 percent) with a single-rate tax of 5.4 percent, coupled with substantial increases in the standard deduction and personal exemption designed to offset the greater exposure of the first $7,000 in income to the top (now only) marginal rate. The bill would raise the standard deduction from $3,700 to $5,700, and from $7,400 to $11,400 for married taxpayers filing jointly.
In the process, the bill also eliminates Georgia’s marriage penalty. The state expands, but does not double, brackets for married couples filing jointly, meaning that a couple filing jointly can experience a higher effective tax rate than two similarly situated individuals filing separately. Provided that each spouse earns at least $7,000, those filing jointly pay about $108 more than those filing separately, a disparity eliminated by a flat tax.
The HB 238 substitute adopted by the Senate also completes the repeal of the state’s capital stock tax, called the Corporate Net Worth Tax. The tax only nets about $40 million each year, or 0.2 percent of state tax collections, but is highly non-neutral in its treatment of Georgia businesses, as it is imposed on value, not net income—that is, without regard to a company’s ability to pay.
The bill’s revised fiscal note (not available online; news coverage here) anticipates that the legislation would cost $286 million annually by 2020, about half a percent of the state budget and one percent of state tax collections. Georgia lawmakers enacted a $900 million tax increase package (on motor fuel and hotels) last year for transportation improvements, and with state revenues up for the fourth year in a row, some legislators think the state is due for a tax cut.
Senate Finance Committee Judson Hill, who authored the substitute, characterized the proposed tax cut as a “fiscally responsible, modest measure.” Although the bill passed the Senate handily, greater resistance is anticipated in the House, which would be required to affirm the new language offered by the Senate.
Get Email Updates from the Tax Foundation
Join the Tax Foundation's fight for sound tax policy Go
About the Tax Policy Blog
The Tax Policy Blog is the official blog of the Tax Foundation, a non-partisan, non-profit research organization that has monitored tax policy at the federal, state and local levels since 1937. Our economists welcome your feedback. If you would like to send an e-mail to the author of a blog post, please click on that person's name to locate his or her e-mail address or visit our staff page here.
Related State Articles
- Lunch Links: Handy Tax Calculator Before Casting Your Presidential Ballot; New York, not Nevada, Could Haul in Biggest Casino Taxes; EU Nations Debate Tax Haven Definition
- Georgia Taxes Are Still a Weak Link in State's Business Climate
- Lunch Links: Trump and Clinton Campaigns Leave Lots to the Imagination on Taxes; Bipartisan Support for Fairer, Simpler Tax Code; Why Supporters of a Carbon Tax Oppose Its Passage on Washington Ballot
- 1 of 22
- next ›