Missouri’s legislature has approved nearly $2 billion in tax incentives for Boeing after a House vote today, and the plan awaits Governor Nixon’s (D) signature. We’ve written on this issue extensively, following it from...
- The Tax Policy Blog
- Earth Day Blog Post: Tax Policy and the Environment
Earth Day Blog Post: Tax Policy and the Environment
Environmental issues have become even more front and center in recent years, and tax policy is in the middle of it all. Any introductory economics student will learn about a concept called externalities, whereby a market transaction between two parties (buyer and sellers) has some spillover effect on a third party that the buyer and seller are not concerned with. Externalities can be either positive or negative. The classic example of a negative externality is pollution. The buyer of steel has no incentive to reduce the pollution of the steel mill that goes into the air, while the steel mill owner has no incentive either. There are two solutions: allocate property rights for the air to some party (which can be transferred via sale) or impose a tax for the right to pollute a given amount of pollutant.
The optimal amount of pollution from a societal well-being perspective in almost all cases is greater than zero, but it is almost always less than the market amount that takes place without regulation or a tax. Even if there is some uncertainty regarding the extent of the harm done by a pollutant (such as the case is with global warming), assuming that there is some probability of some harm existing from the pollution (i.e. greenhouse gas emissions), the optimal tax would be greater than zero (ignoring transaction costs of imposing and enforcing the tax, as well as possible large variances that could exists). Note that this all assumes a benevolent government whose decision is not influenced by special interests, which is where the public choice school of economics questioned Pigouvian taxation.
For more on the issue of externalities and environmental taxation, the following is a list of some of the major papers on the topic in the economic literature, including the two classics from Pigou and Coase, which are highly recommended for those new to this issue.
First, an overview of Pigouvian taxation via Wikipedia.
Read more about Pigouvian taxation from its present-day staunchest defender, N. Gregory Mankiw.
Coase, Ronald. "The Problem of Social Cost" in Journal of Law and Economics, v. 3, no. 1 pp. 1-44, 1960. Available here: http://www.sfu.ca/~allen/CoaseJLE1960.pdf
For a list of papers on energy economics and environmental taxation, check out this page from one of the issue's most influential researchers: Gilbert Metcalf of Tufts University. Recommended highly is his overview of federal tax policy towards energy and his two working papers from 2007 on carbon taxes and cap-and-trade.
Kevin Hassett's and Gilbert Metcalf's review of what would be good federal tax policy towards energy.
Here's a website for an AEI event held last year on the topic of energy taxation, including video.
Minneapolis Fed piece entitled "Putting a Price on Carbon" (nice easy-to-read overview of issue of cap and trade versus carbon tax)
Questioning of Pigouvian Taxation
Buy this blogger a cup of coffee!
Join the Tax Foundation's fight for sound tax policy Go
About the Tax Policy Blog
The Tax Policy Blog is the official weblog of the Tax Foundation, a non-partisan, non-profit research organization that has monitored tax policy at the federal, state and local levels since 1937. Our economists welcome your feedback. If you would like to send an e-mail to the author of a blog post, please click on that person's name to locate his or her e-mail address or visit our staff page here.