President Obama recently gave a lengthy speech on inequality, poverty, and what to do about it. He claimed inequality is increasing, which is debatable, and then offered a few populist ways to reduce it, such as raising...
- States Gorge Themselves on Obesity Taxes
States Gorge Themselves on Obesity Taxes
Single Out Candy, Soda for Unequal Treatment
Washington, DC, October 31, 2011--States are increasingly extending higher tax rates to products like candy and soda, ostensibly to fight obesity. Such moves are unlikely to have an impact on obesity rates and health outcomes, but will create a complex and confusing classification system to divide the "good" food and drink products from the allegedly "bad" ones, according to a new study by the Tax Foundation.
Seventeen states tax candy at a higher rate than other groceries, while four states collect a special excise tax on soda. In 2011, fourteen more states proposed new soda taxes and two states proposed new candy taxes. Some of the soda tax proposals would have raised prices as much as 264%.
"While reducing obesity-related health problems is a worthy goal, adding an additional tax burden to particular food and beverage categories is a clumsy and inefficient strategy," said Tax Foundation analyst Scott Drenkard. "Obesity taxes fall on all consumers, including those who consume candy and soda in moderation and have no weight-related health issues."
Recent studies suggest that even when selective taxes on certain food products do cause individuals to consume less, those same individuals replace the calories avoided with other foods, resulting in no net decrease in caloric intake.
In addition to questions about the effectiveness of reducing obesity rates, the systems already in place for taxing candy and soda illustrate the unexpected difficulties in deciding what does and what does not count as candy and even soda. Chocolate bars that include any kind of flour, for example, generally do not meet the legal definition of candy. In the case of soda, some states exempt beverages with as little as 10% fruit juice, while in Tennessee, Oregon and Texas, drinks must be 100% juice to be exempt.
"The solution to the obesity problem will not come from government authorities picking out a handful of products to saddle with extra taxes," said Drenkard. "Consumers need to be free to make prudent decisions about their own diets and health needs without lawmakers trying to stack the deck in one direction or another."
The Tax Foundation is a nonpartisan research organization that has monitored fiscal policy at the federal, state and local levels since 1937. To schedule an interview, please contact Richard Morrison, the Tax Foundation's Manager of Communications, at 202-464-5102 or email@example.com.
Join the Tax Foundation's fight for sound tax policy Go
Tax Policy Blog
The official weblog of the Tax Foundation.
Tax By State
For information on your state, select it from the drop-down menu.
Ask a Tax Expert
Contact information for Tax Foundation policy staff Ask