A Simple Thought Experiment
I have a simple exercise for the reader. This shouldn’t be difficult to follow, nor should it require any kind of advanced education in economics, nor should it even require you to agree with me about a lot of basic...
This week, former Senator Rick Santorum released details of a tax reform plan.[1] This plan would institute a flat 20 percent tax rate on all varieties of individual income. It would also consolidate all deductions into a single $2,750 per person credit, which would be refundable up to the amount of an individual’s earned income. The plan would also reduce the corporate income tax to that same 20 percent rate. In addition, the plan would eliminate the estate tax and the Alternative Minimum Tax.
Our analysis finds that the plan would reduce federal revenues by $3.2 trillion over the next decade. However, it also would improve incentives to work and invest, which would increase gross domestic product (GDP) by 10.2 percent over the long term. This increase in GDP would translate into 7.3 percent higher wages and 3.1 million new full-time equivalent jobs. After accounting for increased incomes due to these factors, the plan would reduce tax revenues by $1.1 trillion.[2]
According to our Taxes and Growth Model, the increased incentives to work and invest from this tax plan would increase the size of the economy by 10.2 percent over the long run. The plan would lead to 7.3 percent higher wages and a 29 percent larger capital stock. The larger economy would mainly result from a significant reduction in the service price of capital, due to the rate reductions for business and the immediate cost recovery. In addition, the reduction of marginal tax rates on individual income would increase incentives to work and result in 3.1 million full-time equivalent jobs.
|
Table 1. Economic Impact of Senator Santorum’s Tax Reform Plan |
|
|
GDP |
10.2% |
|
Capital Investment |
29% |
|
Wage Rate |
7.3% |
|
Full-time Equivalent Jobs (in thousands) |
3,135 |
|
Source: Tax Foundation Taxes and Growth Model, Oct. 2015. |
|
Revenue Impact
Overall, the plan would reduce federal revenue on a static basis by $3.2 trillion over the next ten years. Most of the revenue loss is due to the reduction in individual and corporate income taxes, which we project to reduce revenues by approximately $1.7 trillion and $1.3 trillion, respectively, over the next decade. The remaining static cost ($238 billion) comes from the elimination of the estate tax.
If we account for the economic growth that the plan would produce, the plan would end up lowering revenue by $1.1 trillion over the next decade. The larger economy would increase wages, which would narrow the revenue lost through the individual income tax by about $1.1 trillion and increase payroll tax revenues by $743 billion, with the remainder of the recouped revenue coming from other taxes.
|
Table 2. Ten-Year Revenue Impact of Senator Santorum’s Tax Reform Plan (Billions of Dollars) |
||
|
Tax |
Static Revenue Impact (2015-2024) |
Dynamic Revenue Impact (2015-2024) |
|
Individual Income Taxes |
-$1,724 |
-$645 |
|
Payroll Taxes |
$0 |
$743 |
|
Corporate Income Taxes |
-$1,260 |
-$1,105 |
|
Excise Taxes |
$0 |
$61 |
|
Estate and Gift Taxes |
-$238 |
-$238 |
|
Other Revenue Sources |
$0 |
$90 |
|
Total |
-$3,223 |
-$1,093 |
|
Source: Tax Foundation Taxes and Growth Model, Oct. 2015. Note: Individual items may not sum to the total due to rounding. |
||
On a static basis, Senator Santorum’s tax plan would increase after-tax incomes by 3 percent, on average. Taxpayers in most income groups would see higher after-tax incomes, while taxpayers in the upper-middle income bracket would see lower after-tax incomes.
Taxpayers in the bottom decile would see a 13.9 percent increase in after-tax income due to the refundable per person credit. The next five deciles (the 10th through 60th percentiles) would see increases in after-tax adjusted gross income (AGI) of between 0.4 and 2.1 percent. Upper-middle-income taxpayers with incomes that fall within the 60th to 90th percentiles would see decreases in their after-tax AGI of between 0.3 and 1.3 percent. Finally, taxpayers with incomes that fall in the highest income class (the 90-100 percent decile) would see an increase in after-tax income of 6.7 percent. The top 1 percent of all taxpayers would see a 15.4 percent increase in after-tax income.
On a dynamic basis, the plan would increase after-tax incomes by 11.2 percent on average. All deciles would see an increase in after-tax AGI of at least 7.5 percent over the long term. Taxpayers that fall in the bottom decile would see their after-tax AGIs increase by 22.5 percent. The middle eight deciles would see increases in their after-tax AGI between 7.5 and 11.5 percent. The top decile would see an increase in after-tax AGI of 14.3 percent, and the top 1 percent of all taxpayers would see an increase in after-tax AGI of 21.0 percent.
|
Table 3. Distributional Analysis for Senator Santorum's Tax Reform Plan |
||
|
Effect of Tax Reform on After-Tax Income Compared to Current Law |
||
|
All Returns by Decile |
Static Distributional Analysis |
Dynamic Distributional Analysis |
|
0% to 10% |
13.9% |
22.5% |
|
10% to 20% |
0.4% |
7.5% |
|
20% to 30% |
1.2% |
8.7% |
|
30% to 40% |
1.8% |
10.2% |
|
40% to 50% |
2.1% |
11.5% |
|
50% to 60% |
1.1% |
10.3% |
|
60% to 70% |
-0.3% |
8.7% |
|
70% to 80% |
-1.2% |
7.7% |
|
80% to 90% |
-1.3% |
7.6% |
|
90% to 100% |
6.7% |
14.3% |
|
99% to 100% |
15.4% |
21.0% |
|
TOTAL FOR ALL |
3.0% |
11.2% |
|
Source: Tax Foundation Taxes and Growth Model, Oct. 2015. |
||
Senator Santorum’s tax plan would enact a number of tax reforms that would lower marginal tax rates on labor. In addition, the reduced corporate income tax with immediate cost recovery would significantly reduce the cost of capital. These changes in the incentives to work and invest would greatly increase the U.S. economy’s size in the long run, leading to higher incomes for taxpayers at all income levels. The plan would also be a large tax cut, which would increase the federal government’s deficit by over $3.2 trillion on a static basis and $1.1 trillion on a dynamic basis.
The Taxes and Growth Model does not take into account the fiscal or economic effects of interest on debt. It also does not require budgets to balance over the long term, nor does it account for the potential macroeconomic effects of any spending cuts that may be required to finance the plan.
Senator Santorum has proposed a repeal of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, colloquially known as Obamacare. Included in these modeling provisions are the 3.8 percent surtax on investment income, and the 0.9 percent Medicare surtax. However, not included are the provisions more specifically applicable to the health care law, such as its excise taxes, its mandate penalties, and its premium tax credits for plans purchased over the exchanges.
[1] Rick Santorum, A Flat Tax Is the Best Path to Prosperity, The Wall Street Journal, Oct. 11, 2015, http://www.wsj.com/articles/a-flat-tax-is-the-best-path-to-prosperity-1444600639.
[2] For a reduction in revenues of this size, it is also likely appropriate to consider the macroeconomic effects that the Taxes and Growth Model does not predict. Among these are the fiscal costs of higher interest payments, as well as the macroeconomic effects of the spending reductions needed to bring the budget into balance.
Tax policy has proven to be one of the major issues of the 2016 presidential campaign. From the start, our research and analysis has been at the center of the debate, informing candidates, the media, and taxpayers. If you find our work useful, please consider supporting us.
If you found this material useful, please consider making a donation to the Tax Foundation.Donate
I have a simple exercise for the reader. This shouldn’t be difficult to follow, nor should it require any kind of advanced education in economics, nor should it even require you to agree with me about a lot of basic...
This week, both Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton gave speeches in Michigan outlining their respective economic policy platforms. Tax policy featured prominently in both speeches: Trump took the opportunity to announce...
